Skip to content

skills/cuopt-user-rules: update with benchmark details - #1335

Merged
ramakrishnap-nv merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
skills-cuopt-user-rules
May 29, 2026
Merged

skills/cuopt-user-rules: update with benchmark details#1335
ramakrishnap-nv merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
skills-cuopt-user-rules

Conversation

@ramakrishnap-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

update with benchmark details

@copy-pr-bot

copy-pr-bot Bot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@ramakrishnap-nv ramakrishnap-nv added non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change improvement Improves an existing functionality labels May 29, 2026
@ramakrishnap-nv
ramakrishnap-nv force-pushed the skills-cuopt-user-rules branch from cb868f8 to b3bc294 Compare May 29, 2026 01:14
Signed-off-by: Ramakrishna Prabhu <ramakrishnap@nvidia.com>
@ramakrishnap-nv
ramakrishnap-nv force-pushed the skills-cuopt-user-rules branch from b3bc294 to d7bc6aa Compare May 29, 2026 01:17
@ramakrishnap-nv
ramakrishnap-nv marked this pull request as ready for review May 29, 2026 01:17
@ramakrishnap-nv
ramakrishnap-nv requested a review from a team as a code owner May 29, 2026 01:17
@ramakrishnap-nv
ramakrishnap-nv requested a review from Iroy30 May 29, 2026 01:17
@ramakrishnap-nv ramakrishnap-nv self-assigned this May 29, 2026
@ramakrishnap-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/nvskills-ci

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 9c5d3c9c-a8a8-450f-957c-7f8b278033a9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d7bc6aa and 25188a8.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • skills/cuopt-user-rules/BENCHMARK.md
  • skills/cuopt-user-rules/skill-card.md
  • skills/cuopt-user-rules/skill.oms.sig
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • skills/cuopt-user-rules/BENCHMARK.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a BENCHMARK report, enriches the skill card metadata and outputs, inserts one blank line in SKILL.md front-matter, and updates the DSSE signature bundle to reflect those file changes.

Changes

Docs and signature update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Skill docs and benchmark files
skills/cuopt-user-rules/SKILL.md, skills/cuopt-user-rules/BENCHMARK.md, skills/cuopt-user-rules/skill-card.md
Inserted a blank line after SKILL.md front-matter, added BENCHMARK.md, and reformatted/expanded skill-card.md metadata, outputs, and evaluation sections.
DSSE signature bundle update
skills/cuopt-user-rules/skill.oms.sig
Updated the DSSE envelope payload digests and replaced the signature to include the new/modified documentation resources.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • NVIDIA/cuopt#1308: Updates skill.oms.sig for cuopt-user-rules evaluation artifacts.
  • NVIDIA/cuopt#1287: Touches cuopt-user-rules skill-card and regenerates skill.oms.sig; related content changes.

Suggested reviewers

  • Iroy30
  • tmckayus
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'skills/cuopt-user-rules: update with benchmark details' accurately reflects the main changes in the PR, which include adding a BENCHMARK.md file and updating related skill documentation.
Description check ✅ Passed The description 'update with benchmark details' is related to the changeset, though minimal in detail. It references the benchmark updates that are central to the PR.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch skills-cuopt-user-rules

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
skills/cuopt-user-rules/SKILL.md (1)

1-231: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

PR title and description do not match the actual changes.

The PR title claims "update with benchmark details" but the only change is adding a blank line for formatting. No benchmark-related content is present in this diff. This suggests either:

  • The PR title/description is incorrect
  • Benchmark changes are in missing commits
  • This is an incomplete submission

Additionally, as per coding guidelines, since this PR changes content under the skills/ directory, you should request NVSkills CI validation by commenting /nvskills-ci and ensure the signature commit remains in the PR.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@skills/cuopt-user-rules/SKILL.md` around lines 1 - 231, PR metadata doesn't
match the diff: SKILL.md only has a formatting blank-line but the
title/description claim "update with benchmark details"; either update the PR
title/description to reflect the actual change, add the missing benchmark
commits, or split into a new PR containing the benchmark content; also, because
this modifies content under skills/, post a comment `/nvskills-ci` to request
NVSkills CI validation and ensure the signature commit (the required NVSkills
signature) remains in the PR so CI can validate the change.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Outside diff comments:
In `@skills/cuopt-user-rules/SKILL.md`:
- Around line 1-231: PR metadata doesn't match the diff: SKILL.md only has a
formatting blank-line but the title/description claim "update with benchmark
details"; either update the PR title/description to reflect the actual change,
add the missing benchmark commits, or split into a new PR containing the
benchmark content; also, because this modifies content under skills/, post a
comment `/nvskills-ci` to request NVSkills CI validation and ensure the
signature commit (the required NVSkills signature) remains in the PR so CI can
validate the change.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: f99c1185-1062-4eea-ba0c-4b0122d02c29

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c61fcb and d7bc6aa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • skills/cuopt-user-rules/SKILL.md

Signed-off-by: nvskills-svc-account <svc-nvskills-signing@nvidia.com>
@copy-pr-bot

copy-pr-bot Bot commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@ramakrishnap-nv
ramakrishnap-nv merged commit 62007a7 into main May 29, 2026
4 checks passed
@ramakrishnap-nv
ramakrishnap-nv deleted the skills-cuopt-user-rules branch July 9, 2026 18:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants