Skip to content

[REVIEW] Upgrade Treelite to 0.93 - #2972

Merged
dantegd merged 2 commits into
NVIDIA:branch-0.16from
chyunsu3:upgrade_treelite
Oct 14, 2020
Merged

[REVIEW] Upgrade Treelite to 0.93#2972
dantegd merged 2 commits into
NVIDIA:branch-0.16from
chyunsu3:upgrade_treelite

Conversation

@chyunsu3

@chyunsu3 chyunsu3 commented Oct 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Upgrade Treelite to 0.93 to use Protobuf 3.13. The version 0.93 is a very minor revision of 0.92. @JohnZed @kkraus14

Depends on rapidsai/integration#151

@chyunsu3
chyunsu3 requested review from a team as code owners October 13, 2020 19:21
@GPUtester

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please update the changelog in order to start CI tests.

View the gpuCI docs here.

@JohnZed JohnZed changed the title Upgrade Treelite to 0.93 [REVIEW] Upgrade Treelite to 0.93 Oct 13, 2020
- umap-learn
- scikit-learn=0.23.1
- treelite=0.92
- treelite=0.93

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe treelite >=0.92,<=0.93?
When we don't have a preference, it seems beneficial to be a little more flexible.

@chyunsu3 chyunsu3 Oct 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We actually want to avoid 0.92 and use 0.93 exclusively, to avoid conflict with BlazingSQL.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

0.93 is understood by conda as 0.93.* so we should be good to use this and pick up any patch/hotfixes

@chyunsu3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

rerun tests

1 similar comment
@dantegd

dantegd commented Oct 14, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rerun tests

@dantegd
dantegd merged commit fbe6272 into NVIDIA:branch-0.16 Oct 14, 2020
@chyunsu3
chyunsu3 deleted the upgrade_treelite branch October 14, 2020 17:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants