fix: remove guardwords-breaking dGLU comment

[saltyminty]

Before submitting

• I agree to license this contribution under the terms of LICENSE.txt.
• I ran pre-commit run and committed any formatting changes.

Affected area

FE OSS kernels or CuTeDSL

Summary

Remove an unprofessional comment from the BF16 grouped GEMM dGLU kernel.

Why

The comment triggers the guardwords COMMENT:broken CI check and does not add
useful maintainer context. Removing it resolves the reported failure without
changing executable code.

Related issues

None.

API and compatibility impact

None. The change removes one comment and leaves executable Python tokens
unchanged.

Testing

• pre-commit run --files python/cudnn/grouped_gemm/grouped_gemm_dglu/moe_grouped_gemm_dglu_dbias.py
  • black: passed
  • black-jupyter: passed
  • clang-format: skipped because no applicable files changed
• Audited comments in all 19 Python files added by PR feat: add BF16 grouped GEMM MoE kernels #415 using Python's
  standard-library tokenizer: 908 post-change comment tokens, zero prohibited
  candidates, and unchanged executable token streams.
• git diff --check: passed.
• GPU/runtime tests were not run because the change is comment-only.
• The guardwords checker is not available in the repository checkout; its
  authoritative result is expected from CI.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Removed an outdated internal code comment; no user-facing behavior or functionality changed.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: fb2c6565-4813-4076-b71f-b025a9e79abd

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3bf02bf and 68ed0cc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• python/cudnn/grouped_gemm/grouped_gemm_dglu/moe_grouped_gemm_dglu_dbias.py

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• python/cudnn/grouped_gemm/grouped_gemm_dglu/moe_grouped_gemm_dglu_dbias.py

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change removes one inline comment before the tensor-memory load operation in the epilogue subtile loop. No executable logic or public declarations are modified.

Changes

Grouped GEMM cleanup

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Epilogue comment cleanup python/cudnn/grouped_gemm/grouped_gemm_dglu/moe_grouped_gemm_dglu_dbias.py	Removes the inline AST/constexpr tracking comment before copy_atom_t2r; the tensor-memory load logic remains unchanged.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly states the main change: removing a guardwords-breaking dGLU comment.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description matches the template and includes the required sections, with clear summary, rationale, impact, and testing details.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}