Adjust verbosity of cudf-polars-polars-tests - #22980
Conversation
The recent CI failures running upstream polars tests have all been in the SPMD engine, not the in-memory engine. Reduce the test output for in-memory, and increase it for SPMD.
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe CI test script updates its SPDX attribution and adjusts pytest verbosity flags in two cudf-polars/polars test invocations. ChangesCI test script updates
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
/merge |
|
That's a strange error I haven't seen before: Looking into it. |
|
Compared to https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf/actions/runs/28175651520/job/8345836816 (a successful run), there's no difference in packages other than libcudf/pylibcudf. |
|
I noticed that the build job used a different vm images commit from the test job (https://github.com/nv-gha-runners/vm-images/commit/6160e56e8f160cb5c6ec5fc49c83df2fa8daf183 vs https://github.com/nv-gha-runners/vm-images/commit/bdfd14b4c1b28580d3b2aa2c4a394344354478ae). Trying to rebuild everything to see if its resolved. |
|
Same errors in https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf/actions/runs/28194276461/job/83521886270?pr=22980. The associated build had the new commit. |
|
I removed the |
We run upstream polars tests with cudf-polars using two of or engines: in-memory and SPMD. The recent CI failures running upstream polars tests have all been in the SPMD engine, while the in-memory engine has been passing fine. This change reduces the pytest verbosity for the in-memory run (making the logs easier to scan), and increases it for the SPMD run (hopefully helping with identifying the flaky tests). Authors: - Tom Augspurger (https://github.com/TomAugspurger) Approvers: - Gil Forsyth (https://github.com/gforsyth) - Matthew Murray (https://github.com/Matt711) URL: #22980
Description
We run upstream polars tests with cudf-polars using two of or engines: in-memory and SPMD.
The recent CI failures running upstream polars tests have all been in the SPMD engine, while the in-memory engine has been passing fine. This change reduces the pytest verbosity for the in-memory run (making the logs easier to scan), and increases it for the SPMD run (hopefully helping with identifying the flaky tests).