Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xxhash cleanups #313

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 5, 2023
Merged

xxhash cleanups #313

merged 10 commits into from
Jun 5, 2023

Conversation

sleeepyjack
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is a follow-up on #310 and addresses review comments from @bdice.

@sleeepyjack sleeepyjack added the Needs Review Awaiting reviews before merging label Jun 1, 2023
@@ -86,20 +86,20 @@ struct XXHash_32 {
constexpr result_type __host__ __device__ operator()(Key const& key) const noexcept
{
// TODO do we need to add checks/hints for alignment?
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sleeepyjack sleeepyjack Jun 1, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can someone comment on this? I'm not sure if the excessive reinterpret_casting leads to pitfalls.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the offline discussion, downcasting to the char pointer shouldn't cause any problems and blocks (or the uint32_t pointer) won't be used if the key size is smaller than 4 bytes so the current implementation should be safe.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

8c4f167 sprinkles in some [[maybe_unused]] attributes for good measure.

@PointKernel PointKernel added the type: feature request New feature request label Jun 1, 2023
include/cuco/detail/hash_functions/xxhash.cuh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -86,20 +86,20 @@ struct XXHash_32 {
constexpr result_type __host__ __device__ operator()(Key const& key) const noexcept
{
// TODO do we need to add checks/hints for alignment?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

include/cuco/detail/hash_functions/xxhash.cuh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@PointKernel PointKernel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sleeepyjack sleeepyjack merged commit 33f2c2b into NVIDIA:dev Jun 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs Review Awaiting reviews before merging type: feature request New feature request
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants