Skip to content

[https://nvbugs/6478723][fix] Unwaive TestNemotronV3Super::test_nvfp4_4gpus_hopper_w4a16 after the MTPEagleDynamicTreeWorker fix - #17855

Merged
zhaoyangwang-nvidia merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
zhaoyangwang-nvidia:unwaive-6478723
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

[https://nvbugs/6478723][fix] Unwaive TestNemotronV3Super::test_nvfp4_4gpus_hopper_w4a16 after the MTPEagleDynamicTreeWorker fix#17855
zhaoyangwang-nvidia merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
zhaoyangwang-nvidia:unwaive-6478723

Conversation

@zhaoyangwang-nvidia

@zhaoyangwang-nvidia zhaoyangwang-nvidia commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Root cause: MTPEagleDynamicTreeWorker overrode SpecWorkerBase.forward, which __init_subclass__ forbids — the resulting class-creation TypeError surfaced in L0_PostMerge as RuntimeError: Executor worker returned error on TestNemotronV3Super::test_nvfp4_4gpus_hopper_w4a16 (nvbugs/6478723), and the test was waived.
  • Fix: The root cause was already fixed in [https://nvbugs/6478723][fix] Rename forward -> _forward_impl AND stash the extra dynamic-tree state on… #16733 (rename forward -> _forward_impl and restore the extra dynamic-tree state via _ensure_spec_dec_state_restored). This PR only removes the now-stale waive so the test runs again on main.
  • No product code change: one line removed from tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt.

Test plan

Links

Dev Engineer Review

  • Removed the stale waiver for TestNemotronV3Super::test_nvfp4_4gpus_hopper_w4a16.
  • The change affects only tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt.
  • The entry removal uses the expected format and has no unintended scope.
  • The change has no API, performance, or error-handling impact.
  • The test is re-enabled because PR #16733 fixed the underlying MTPEagleDynamicTreeWorker issue.

QA Engineer Review

  • Modified tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt.
  • Removed the waiver entry for TestNemotronV3Super::test_nvfp4_4gpus_hopper_w4a16.
  • No test-db/ or qa/ files were modified.
  • Verdict: needs follow-up because CBTS coverage data is unavailable.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 7fe78d1a-9d84-41fb-a4ed-cc44043a1ce8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bef843e and 5cd2a94.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt

Included review availability: Your plan includes up to 12 reviews per rolling hour; 11 remain after this review.


Walkthrough

The integration test list no longer contains the waiver for TestNemotronV3Super::test_nvfp4_4gpus_hopper_w4a16.

Changes

Nemotron V3 Super test waiver

Layer / File(s) Summary
Remove test waiver
tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt
Removed the skip waiver for the NVFP4 four-GPU Hopper test.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 5cd2a

This change only re-enables an existing integration test and does not alter product behavior; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title uses the required NVBugs and fix format and clearly states that the specified test waiver was removed after the fix.
Description check ✅ Passed The description explains the root cause, references the existing fix, identifies the one-line change, and provides relevant test coverage.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@zhaoyangwang-nvidia

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/bot run

@tensorrt-cicd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PR_Github #66918 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: c64ff46 Link to invocation

@tensorrt-cicd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PR_Github #66918 [ run ] completed with state FAILURE. Commit: c64ff46
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #54471 completed with status: 'UNSTABLE'

CI Report

⚠️ Multi-GPU Label Required:
Multi-GPU tests require the ci: full pre-merge approved label on this PR. Ask a member of NVIDIA/trt-llm-ci-approvers to add the label, then re-trigger CI with the same bot command (no rebase needed).

⚠️ Action Required:

  • Please check the failed tests and fix your PR
  • If you cannot view the failures, ask the CI triggerer to share details
  • Once fixed, request an NVIDIA team member to trigger CI again

Link to invocation

…_4gpus_hopper_w4a16

The waive was added while MTPEagleDynamicTreeWorker illegally overrode
SpecWorkerBase.forward, which raised a TypeError at class creation and
surfaced as 'Executor worker returned error'. That root cause was fixed
in NVIDIA#16733, so re-enable the test to confirm it passes on main.

Signed-off-by: ZhaoyangWang <zhaoyangw@nvidia.com>
@zhaoyangwang-nvidia

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Rebased onto latest main, which now contains the unwaive from #17830 (test_beam_search_e2e[multi_process-TorchSampler-no_cuda_graph_and_overlap-stop_token_ids0-1-1-True-True-True], nvbugs/6581048). Explicitly requesting the stages that own both unwaived tests so neither is silently skipped:

@zhaoyangwang-nvidia

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/bot run --extra-stage "DGX_H100-4_GPUs-PyTorch-Others-1, A30-PyTorch-1, A30-PyTorch-2"

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer.

@tensorrt-cicd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PR_Github #66960 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: 5cd2a94 Link to invocation

@tensorrt-cicd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PR_Github #66960 [ run ] completed with state FAILURE. Commit: 5cd2a94
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #54508 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

CI Report

⚠️ Action Required:

  • Please check the failed tests and fix your PR
  • If you cannot view the failures, ask the CI triggerer to share details
  • Once fixed, request an NVIDIA team member to trigger CI again

CI Agent Failure Analysis

Link to invocation

@zhaoyangwang-nvidia

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/bot run --extra-stage "DGX_H100-4_GPUs-PyTorch-Others-1, A30-PyTorch-1, A30-PyTorch-2"

@tensorrt-cicd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PR_Github #67038 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: 5cd2a94 Link to invocation

@tensorrt-cicd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PR_Github #67038 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS. Commit: 5cd2a94
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #54581 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

CI Report

⚠️ Action Required:

  • Please check the failed tests and fix your PR
  • If you cannot view the failures, ask the CI triggerer to share details
  • Once fixed, request an NVIDIA team member to trigger CI again

CI Agent Failure Analysis

Link to invocation

@zhaoyangwang-nvidia

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/bot run --disable-fail-fast --extra-stage "DGX_H100-4_GPUs-PyTorch-Others-1, A30-PyTorch-1, A30-PyTorch-2"

@tensorrt-cicd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PR_Github #67087 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: 5cd2a94 Link to invocation

@tensorrt-cicd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PR_Github #67087 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS. Commit: 5cd2a94
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #54625 completed with status: 'SUCCESS'

CI Report

Link to invocation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants