-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
docs: complete v0.0.104 audit follow-ups #8588
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e3a28de
docs: complete v0.0.104 audit follow-ups
miyoungc 7895a61
docs: address audit follow-up review
miyoungc 2cc3fa8
Apply suggestion from @miyoungc
miyoungc d70bc43
Apply suggestion from @miyoungc
miyoungc 538e684
Apply suggestion from @miyoungc
miyoungc File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Scope the vLLM statement to qualified two-node clusters.
The profile contract in
managed-inference/presets/vllm.dgx-spark-gb10.dual.deepseek-v4-flash-0731.yamlrequires exactly two nodes, DGX Spark qualification on every node, and thehost-cluster.direct-cx7topology qualification. The current “DGX Spark users” wording is broader than that contract. State that this applies to qualified two-node DGX Spark clusters.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents