feat(onboard): add MiniMax provider - #6564
Conversation
Register MiniMax as a first-class OpenAI-compatible onboarding provider. This lets setup and sandbox routing select MiniMax-M3 directly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds MiniMax as a new supported inference/onboarding provider: a ChangesMiniMax Provider Integration
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
Thanks for the MiniMax contribution. Before a maintainer can vet this copy PR or run trusted CI, the contributor-compliance gates need to be fixed:
Please replace the branch history with GitHub-Verified commit(s) using the repository contributor workflow and add the matching |
|
Follow-up for the compliant-history refresh: the current exact head also has substantive CI gaps that should be fixed in the same contributor-owned replacement.
The existing compliance request remains the first hard gate: the PR body needs the contributor's |
…xisting-provider-registry-recvoNmbfQOgyd
E2E Advisor RecommendationRequired E2E: Dispatch hint: Full advisor summaryE2E Recommendation AdvisorBase: Required E2E
Optional E2E
New E2E recommendations
Dispatch hint
|
…xisting-provider-registry-recvoNmbfQOgyd
…xisting-provider-registry-recvoNmbfQOgyd
…xisting-provider-registry-recvoNmbfQOgyd
…xisting-provider-registry-recvoNmbfQOgyd
…xisting-provider-registry-recvoNmbfQOgyd
|
Release sweep: deferring this PR from The MiniMax integration remains unique work, but it is not releasable in its current contributor history: the feature commit is not GitHub Verified, the PR body lacks the required Please keep the replacement narrowly scoped and re-request targeting once those gates are satisfied. |
|
Replaced by #6761 from a clean branch based on current main. Closing this PR in favor of the replacement. |
Reason: add target provider/model to existing provider registry
Summary
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes