Optimizer doc fix

[dnandakumar-nv]

Description

Fixes minor issue with documentation for the email phishing analyzer example

By Submitting this PR I confirm:

• I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
• We require that all contributors "sign-off" on their commits. This certifies that the contribution is your original work, or you have rights to submit it under the same license, or a compatible license.
  • Any contribution which contains commits that are not Signed-Off will not be accepted.
• When the PR is ready for review, new or existing tests cover these changes.
• When the PR is ready for review, the documentation is up to date with these changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Outputs section updated: added optimized configuration file, per-iteration numeric trial configs, full trials dataframe export, Pareto visualization plots, and explicit per-generation prompt history files alongside existing prompt artifacts.
• Chores
  • Accepted vocabulary list updated to include the term "Pareto".

[copy-pr-bot]

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updated the example README to list additional optimizer output artifacts and added one accepted vocabulary token; no code, logic, or control-flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary of changes
Documentation update examples/evaluation_and_profiling/email_phishing_analyzer/README.md	Expanded Outputs section to enumerate new generated artifacts: optimized_config.yml; per-iteration numeric config files (e.g., config_numeric_trial_0.yml); trials_dataframe_params.csv; plots/ (Pareto visualizations); per-generation prompt history files (e.g., optimized_prompts_gen{N}.json); and adjusted previously listed artifacts.
Vocabulary update ci/vale/styles/config/vocabularies/nat/accept.txt	Added the token Pareto to the accepted vocabulary list.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested labels
doc

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	⚠️ Warning	The title “Optimizer doc fix” is a brief noun phrase that does not follow the imperative mood guideline and lacks sufficient context about which documentation is being updated, making it unclear to reviewers what the pull request actually accomplishes.	Please revise the title to use imperative mood and clearly describe the change, for example: “Fix optimizer documentation in email phishing analyzer example.”

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 87f7396 and b235765.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• ci/vale/styles/config/vocabularies/nat/accept.txt (1 hunks)
• examples/evaluation_and_profiling/email_phishing_analyzer/README.md (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• ci/vale/styles/config/vocabularies/nat/accept.txt

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• examples/evaluation_and_profiling/email_phishing_analyzer/README.md

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 11d3765 and 87f7396.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• examples/evaluation_and_profiling/email_phishing_analyzer/README.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (3)

**/README.@(md|ipynb)

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/general.mdc)

Ensure READMEs follow the naming convention; avoid deprecated names; use “NeMo Agent Toolkit” (capital T) in headings

Files:

• examples/evaluation_and_profiling/email_phishing_analyzer/README.md

**/*

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

**/*: # Code Review Instructions

• Ensure the code follows best practices and coding standards. - For Python code, follow
  PEP 20 and
  PEP 8 for style guidelines.
• Check for security vulnerabilities and potential issues. - Python methods should use type hints for all parameters and return values.
  Example:

  def my_function(param1: int, param2: str) -> bool:
      pass

• For Python exception handling, ensure proper stack trace preservation:
  • When re-raising exceptions: use bare raise statements to maintain the original stack trace,
    and use logger.error() (not logger.exception()) to avoid duplicate stack trace output.
  • When catching and logging exceptions without re-raising: always use logger.exception()
    to capture the full stack trace information.

Documentation Review Instructions - Verify that documentation and comments are clear and comprehensive. - Verify that the documentation doesn't contain any TODOs, FIXMEs or placeholder text like "lorem ipsum". - Verify that the documentation doesn't contain any offensive or outdated terms. - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes, ensure the documentation doesn't contain any

words listed in the ci/vale/styles/config/vocabularies/nat/reject.txt file, words that might appear to be
spelling mistakes but are listed in the ci/vale/styles/config/vocabularies/nat/accept.txt file are OK.

Misc. - All code (except .mdc files that contain Cursor rules) should be licensed under the Apache License 2.0,

and should contain an Apache License 2.0 header comment at the top of each file.

• Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed.

Files:

• examples/evaluation_and_profiling/email_phishing_analyzer/README.md

examples/**/*

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

examples/**/*: - This directory contains example code and usage scenarios for the toolkit, at a minimum an example should
contain a README.md or file README.ipynb.

• If an example contains Python code, it should be placed in a subdirectory named src/ and should
  contain a pyproject.toml file. Optionally, it might also contain scripts in a scripts/ directory.
• If an example contains YAML files, they should be placed in a subdirectory named configs/. - If an example contains sample data files, they should be placed in a subdirectory named data/, and should
  be checked into git-lfs.

Files:

• examples/evaluation_and_profiling/email_phishing_analyzer/README.md

[dnandakumar-nv]

/ok to test 87f7396

[dnandakumar-nv]

/ok to test 11e3d16

[dnandakumar-nv]

/ok to test b235765

[dnandakumar-nv]

/merge