-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
Fixes for slurm tests #1192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fixes for slurm tests #1192
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6dc97b8
Remove bfcl from llama nemotron tests
Kipok 9379b25
Fix qwen3 bfcl test
Kipok 4fa081e
Fix for clone and run
Kipok ab6e055
Fix bfcl and scicode prepare
Kipok 1cc7892
Tmp change
Kipok 86d9c71
Fix bfcl check results
Kipok 9fedaf2
Update constraint
Kipok b1c56fb
Fix bfcl test
Kipok 8315af2
Update gsm-plus to hf api
Kipok 487f0dd
Fix bfcl test
Kipok 092dbba
Merge branch 'main' into igitman/slurm-test-fixes
Kipok 2a55c27
Optimize scicode data saving
Kipok 4154099
Merge branch 'main' into igitman/slurm-test-fixes
gwarmstrong File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
File
test_aai.jsonlis being opened and written to in outer scope, but also written within nested loop for each split. The outerwithblock keeps the file open during the entire loop, meaning bothdev.jsonlandtest.jsonlentries are written sequentially. However, there's no guarantee the file is properly synced since writes happen concurrently through bothfoutandtest_aai_foutfile handles. While this may work, it's cleaner to write totest_aai.jsonlafter the split files are complete.Additionally, per CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines (line 40-42), avoid data loss by completing computation before writing. Consider writing all files separately first, then concatenating to avoid partial writes if there's a failure.
Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!