Skip to content

docs: add release note for Pygments bump (PR #1681) #1729

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
lbliii merged 2 commits into from
Apr 3, 2026
Merged

docs: add release note for Pygments bump (PR #1681) #1729

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
28bc75c
docs: add release note for Pygments bump (PR #1681)
lbliii Apr 3, 2026
119b469
docs: remove transitive dependency entries from release notes
lbliii Apr 3, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion fern/versions/v26.04/pages/about/release-notes/index.mdx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ Added tqdm progress bars to `RayActorPoolExecutor` for real-time visibility into

- **Cosmos-Xenna**: Updated from 0.1.2 to 0.2.0 with simplified resource model
- **Ray**: Updated to 2.54
- **cryptography**: Bumped from >=46.0.5 to >=46.0.6 to address CVE GHSA-m959-cc7f-wv43 (PR #1682)
- **uv**: Added minimum required version (>=0.7.0) to prevent lockfile revision drift
Comment on lines 70 to 73

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot Apr 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Pygments entry missing — PR does opposite of its description

The PR description states: "Adds a release note entry for the Pygments 2.19.2 → 2.20.0 dependency bump (PR #1681)", but the actual diff shows only a deletion — no Pygments entry was added anywhere in the file. The Dependency Updates section after this change contains no mention of Pygments at all.

Additionally, the line that was removed (cryptography CVE bump) is not mentioned in the PR description, so it is unclear whether that deletion is intentional.

Expected state after the PR (per description):

Suggested change
- **Cosmos-Xenna**: Updated from 0.1.2 to 0.2.0 with simplified resource model
- **Ray**: Updated to 2.54
- **cryptography**: Bumped from >=46.0.5 to >=46.0.6 to address CVE GHSA-m959-cc7f-wv43 (PR #1682)
- **uv**: Added minimum required version (>=0.7.0) to prevent lockfile revision drift
- **Cosmos-Xenna**: Updated from 0.1.2 to 0.2.0 with simplified resource model
- **Ray**: Updated to 2.54
- **Pygments**: Bumped from 2.19.2 to 2.20.0 (PR #1681)
- **uv**: Added minimum required version (>=0.7.0) to prevent lockfile revision drift

Please verify:

  1. Whether the Pygments entry should be added here.
  2. Whether the cryptography entry removal is intentional (it documented a security CVE fix and may be important to retain).


## Bug Fixes
Expand Down
Loading