Mods to MYNN sfc and PBL for fractional/coupled#40
Conversation
update 6/10/2020
|
This PR has been pulled into #41 and will be merged as part of it. |
ShanSunNOAA
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you modify similar line in GFS_PBL_generic.F90
if (fice(i) > one - epsln) then ! no open water, use results from CICE
epsln is not used and can be removed. Thanks!
This will impact the s2s runs when we merge this to the authoritative repositories. Is this what we want? |
|
Yes, practically it is the same, but using if (.not. wet(i)) would be more
consistent with the rest of the routine. Thanks, -Shan
…On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:26 AM Dom Heinzeller ***@***.***> wrote:
Could you modify similar line in GFS_PBL_generic.F90
if (fice(i) > one - epsln) then ! no open water, use results from CICE
epsln is not used and can be removed. Thanks!
This will impact the s2s runs when we merge this to the authoritative
repositories. Is this what we want?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#40 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALORMVRSH7OC774MXTOCRMDRYNUCNANCNFSM4OCFQGIQ>
.
|
Shan, I can't find this line in GFS_PBL_generic.F90. That file in gsd/develop has: I will make the corresponding change in module_MYNNPBL_wrapper.F90 and push it to the PR. |
@shansun6 please check this commit I just pushed: 728c076 |
Mods to MYNN sfc and PBL for fractional/coupled for latest gsd/develop code (based on #40)
Address Chunxi's comments
Changed UGWP diagnostic variable declaration intents from 'out' to 'inout'
Changed UGWP diagnostic variable declaration intents from 'out' to 'inout'
MYNN surface layer needs very slight changes if it will ever be used to compute surface heat/moisture fluxes (currently done by sfc_nst, sfc_ocean, sfc_sice, sfc_drv_ruc) in the fractional framework.
MYNN boundary layer needs an updated way to compute fluxes for the ocean in the case of fractional mask (this change follows the procedure done in GFS_PBL_generic.F90).
Testing finds these changes make no difference in the case of non-fractional mask and atmosphere-only, so regression test GSD_v0 should pass.
@joeolson42 is in favor of these changes.
Refer to Issue 39 (#39)
Suggested reviewers: @joeolson42 and @shansun6