Update damping and time-step#2575
Conversation
modified: parm/config/gefs/config.fcst parm/config/gefs/config.ufs parm/config/gfs/config.fcst parm/config/gfs/config.ufs Apply new damping and time-step options to all supported atmos resolutions and to both GFS and GEFS. Apply the same damping to both GFS and GDAS cycles. Stronger damping was applied to GDAS in GFSv16. This new damping option includes both explicit Rayleigh damping aaplied to u and v and implicit damping applied to w.
|
@lisa-bengtsson Lisa, would you like to add your following changes to branch https://github.com/yangfanglin/global-workflow/tree/dycore_update_hr4 and to this PR ? xr_cnvcld = .false. for the C96 configuration only. It would need to be added both to config.ufs and to the parsing of the fv3 namelist. The default should be .true. for all other configurations. |
WalterKolczynski-NOAA
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please review your code to make sure your indentation matches the surrounding code (using spaces) and remove the old code that has been commented out.
WalterKolczynski-NOAA
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks fine other than one more indent fix.
Co-authored-by: Walter Kolczynski - NOAA <Walter.Kolczynski@noaa.gov>
WalterKolczynski-NOAA
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Conditionally approved pending successful completion of CI tests
|
Hi Fanglin, yes I can add the xr_cnvcld namelist, let me see if I can do it from Orion as Hera is down today. |
|
I can confirm that the parameters in the gfs configs match the parameters specified in the google doc. I will wait for @lisa-bengtsson's update before formally approving. |
|
I added a PR: yangfanglin#1 |
aerorahul
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good. Just a couple of comments that were possibly accidentally removed.
reviewed. Need minor indentation adjustments |
Add xr_cnvcld flag to namelist and configure files
|
Sorry Fanglin, those indentations have a life on their own, maybe you have better luck on your end? |
@WalterKolczynski-NOAA Walter, I had the same trouble too but you were able to "suggest" changes for which I accepted. Can you do the same to Lisa's modifications that I had already merged to this PR? The indentations are still not aligned. |
|
Experiment C48_S2SWA_gefs FAILED on Orion in |
|
Experiment C48_S2SW FAILED on Orion in |
|
Experiment C48_ATM FAILED on Orion in |
|
Experiment C96_atm3DVar FAILED on Orion in |
|
Experiment C96C48_hybatmDA FAILED on Orion in |
|
Experiment C96C48_hybatmDA FAILED on Orion in |
|
Experiment C96_atm3DVar FAILED on Orion with error logs: Follow link here to view the contents of the above file(s): (link) |
|
Experiment C96_atm3DVar FAILED on Orion in |
|
Experiment C48_S2SWA_gefs FAILED on Orion in |
|
Experiment C48_S2SW FAILED on Orion in |
|
Experiment C48_ATM FAILED on Orion in |
|
I'm trying to sort out what the issue is on Orion. Just ignore them for now. |
|
CI Passed Hera at |
|
Experiment C48_ATM FAILED on Orion with error logs: Follow link here to view the contents of the above file(s): (link) |
|
Experiment C48_ATM FAILED on Orion in |
|
Experiment C48_ATM FAILED on Orion with error logs: Follow link here to view the contents of the above file(s): (link) |
|
Experiment C48_ATM FAILED on Orion in |
|
Experiment C48_ATM FAILED on Orion with error logs: Follow link here to view the contents of the above file(s): (link) |
|
Experiment C48_ATM FAILED on Orion in |
|
I just looked at this orion failure, it looks a bit odd. Do we think this is a machine issue or something else? |
|
One of the job failed at the post processing step for FH71 but the forecast started from FH78. It is strange. It appears the job was rerun as a warm start but this group of post job still tried to processing earlier forecast hours. Can someone remove everything and restart the CI test on Orion ? |
|
CI Passed Orion at |
Description
Updates the model to use explicit Rayleigh damping for u/v and implicit damping to w. This improves model stability and allows for longer timesteps. Also unifies the GDAS and GFS to use the same damping.
Results from a test at the C1152 resolution (coupled model) can be found at https://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/wx24fy/C1152/newdamp/
Resolves #2574
Type of change
Change characteristics
How has this been tested?
Checklist