Skip to content

Fb update issue temp#507

Merged
aliabdolali merged 51 commits into
NOAA-EMC:developfrom
aliabdolali:fb_update_issue_temp
Nov 19, 2021
Merged

Fb update issue temp#507
aliabdolali merged 51 commits into
NOAA-EMC:developfrom
aliabdolali:fb_update_issue_temp

Conversation

@aliabdolali
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@aliabdolali aliabdolali commented Oct 26, 2021

Pull Request Summary

This PR updates the issue and pull request templates and refers users related questions to the discussion section.

Description

Provide a detailed description of what this PR does. update issue templates.
What bug does it fix, or what feature does it add? NA
Is a change of answers expected from this PR? NA

Issue(s) addressed

  • Is there an issue associated with this development (bug fix, enhancement, new feature)? NA

coauthor: @JessicaMeixner-NOAA

Check list

Commit Message

  • update issue templates

Testing

  • How were these changes tested? NA
  • Are the changes covered by regression tests? (If not, why? Do new tests need to be added?) NA
  • If a new feature was added, was a new regression test added? NA
  • Have regression tests been run? NA
  • Which compiler / HPC you used to run the regression tests in the PR? NA

UKMO-lsampson and others added 30 commits July 22, 2020 11:44
to ensure they comply with the limits of the nameslist.
Changes to add support to 360-day and 365-day (no leap year) calendar - see ticket #209
  * Additional CALTYPE namelist parameter in MISC section
  * New ww3_tc1 regtest.
* Updated ww3_bound and ww3_bounc to handle model grids formulated on a rotated pole.
* Manual and nml/inp files to updated clarify that ww3_bound/ww3_bounc only accept input spectra formulated on a standard pole grid.
Updates to allow a coupling time step that is different from the model time step. 
* Includes new regtest (in ww3_tp2.14) for non-default oasis time step.
* ww3_tp2.14 regtest added to matrix.base.
update feature request tmp
update doc tmp
update bug report tmp
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I think this is better since there is not an added text to each issue template. However, I'm still curious as to what this will look like for when someone goes to the issues page.

@aliabdolali
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think this is better since there is not an added text to each issue template. However, I'm still curious as to what this will look like for when someone goes to the issues page.

From what I searched, there is no way to see it until it is merged. It is following the example (github/feedback#2858), so we can merge and see.

@JessicaMeixner-NOAA
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Interested to hear @ukmo-ccbunney thoughts before approving.

@ukmo-ccbunney
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Something I am not clear on here - is this the text that will appear when the "Issues" tab is selected, or when we create a "New Issue"?

I imagined that we would have extra entries in the "New Issue" page that would direct users to the discussion section if they wanted to ask about general model run questions, etc.

E.g. something with a button that links to this URL:

https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/WW3/discussions/new?category=q-a

in addition to the existing new "Issue" buttons.

Maybe I am misunderstanding something here?

@aliabdolali
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

aliabdolali commented Nov 16, 2021

Something I am not clear on here - is this the text that will appear when the "Issues" tab is selected, or when we create a "New Issue"?

I imagined that we would have extra entries in the "New Issue" page that would direct users to the discussion section if they wanted to ask about general model run questions, etc.

E.g. something with a button that links to this URL:

https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/WW3/discussions/new?category=q-a

in addition to the existing new "Issue" buttons.

Maybe I am misunderstanding something here?

@ukmo-ccbunney It will be like this: when you click on a new issue, it will give you four options for issues (GET STARTED) and a couple of OPEN icons, linked to the discussion (see this example).

@JessicaMeixner-NOAA
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Maybe I can make a fake repo and add this in to see exactly what it would look like.

@JessicaMeixner-NOAA
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@JessicaMeixner-NOAA
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Here's a screen shot:
Screen Shot 2021-11-16 at 11 59 17 AM

I'm going to test a few changes with this repo. If you want to test others, just make a temporary repo in GitHub and copy in the .github directory from WW3 here or you could probably just change your default branch on your fork to your test branch to see the changes in retrospect...

@JessicaMeixner-NOAA
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Okay, here's my alternative suggestion for the issue page:
Screen Shot 2021-11-16 at 12 10 36 PM
which can be previewed here: https://github.com/JessicaMeixner-NOAA/testforww3temporary/issues/new/choose

and I also modified the PR template, see preview:
JessicaMeixner-NOAA/testforww3temporary#1
which is perhaps out of the scope of this PR/discussion.

@ukmo-ccbunney
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Great - that looks good @JessicaMeixner-NOAA
I wonder if it would be better to have the links to the Discussion tab open a new discussion, like the Issue links do?
You can do that with the URL I mentioned in the chat above.

https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/WW3/discussions/new?category=q-a

Or perhaps we prefer to just send users to the Discussion/q-a page first so they can check whether their question has already been answered?

Either way, I like the new Issue template.

@JessicaMeixner-NOAA
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@aliabdolali I made a PR to your branch here: https://github.com/aliabdolali/WW3/pull/2

Should I add the suggestions I had for the PR template to that branch or should I create a new PR?

@aliabdolali
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@aliabdolali I made a PR to your branch here: aliabdolali#2

Should I add the suggestions I had for the PR template to that branch or should I create a new PR?

Can you make a PR to my PR or I can manually do it, either way, works for me.

@aliabdolali
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

aliabdolali commented Nov 17, 2021

@ukmo-ccbunney thanks for the feedback. hope we get fewer user support requests in the issue section.

@JessicaMeixner-NOAA
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@JessicaMeixner-NOAA JessicaMeixner-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve, but let's wait for @ukmo-ccbunney's approval before merging.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ukmo-ccbunney ukmo-ccbunney left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me!
It's a shame we can't get the "Discussion" buttons to look the same as the "Issue" buttons, but I think that is a GitHub issue that some other users have raised.

@aliabdolali aliabdolali merged commit bf41d9b into NOAA-EMC:develop Nov 19, 2021
kestonsmith-noaa pushed a commit to kestonsmith-noaa/WW3 that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
…itial, ocn -> wat, merra2 threading (NOAA-EMC#520)

* changed .gitmodules to point to merra2  fv3atm
* Update .gitmodules and submodule pointer for fv3atm for code review and testing
* update submodule pointer for fv3atm
* Update regression test baseline date in tests/rt.sh; run-ci
* RT JOBS PASSED: hera.gnu. Log file uploaded.
* RT JOBS PASSED: gaea.intel. Log file uploaded.
* RT JOBS PASSED: hera.intel. Log file uploaded.
* RT JOBS PASSED: orion.intel. Log file uploaded.
* Regression test logs for wcoss_dell_p3 and wcoss_cray
* Regression test logs for cheyenne.gnu
* Regression test logs for cheyenne.intel
* Regression test log for jet.intel
* Revert change to .gitmodules and update submodule pointer for fv3atm
Co-authored-by: anning.cheng <anning.cheng@noaa.gov>
Co-authored-by: Brian Curtis <brian.curtis@noaa.gov>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants