Output hourly PM2.5 and O3 for AQM#591
Conversation
concentration; 3)Remove instant PM2.5 and O3 concentraction.
KaiWang-NOAA
left a comment
KaiWang-NOAA
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi Wen, I only have a minor change request for MDLFLD.f. We don't need to do the unit conversion for AVGPMTF.
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into post_aqm
|
@JianpingHuang-NOAA @KaiWang-NOAA @Ho-ChunHuang-NOAA The test results are at /u/wen.meng/ptmp/post_aqm_2022112706. Can you verify them? |
|
@wen Meng - NOAA Federal ***@***.***> I saw the following line by
using wgrib2
549:171723272:d=2022112706:AOTK:entire atmosphere (considered as a single
layer):60 hour fcst*:aerosol=Ozone:aerosol_size <0*:
In addition, can you test the updated UPP with our latest near-real time
run, C22? The model output files (dyn/phy) can be found from
:/lfs/h2/emc/ptmp/jianping.huang/emc.para/com/aqm/v7.0/aqm.v7.0.c22.20221206/06
(Cactus)
@perry Shafran - NOAA Affiliate ***@***.***> @ho-chun Huang
***@***.***> Can you read it with your verification system?
…On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:51 AM WenMeng-NOAA ***@***.***> wrote:
@JianpingHuang-NOAA <https://github.com/JianpingHuang-NOAA> @KaiWang-NOAA
<https://github.com/KaiWang-NOAA> @Ho-ChunHuang-NOAA
<https://github.com/Ho-ChunHuang-NOAA>
I add some changes for outputting two additional new variables as:
549:171723272:d=2022112706:AOTK:entire atmosphere (considered as a single layer):60 hour fcst:aerosol=Ozone:aerosol_size <0:
551:172312604:d=2022112706:HPBL:surface:60 hour fcst:
The test results are at /u/wen.meng/ptmp/post_aqm_2022112706. Can you
verify them?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#591 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANA2PIZZKJPDXKFCJY5G44DWMHRU7ANCNFSM6AAAAAASAEHK6M>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
I do not understand the task you want me to perform. Please clarify; Do you want me to test read on the of /lfs/h2/emc/ptmp/jianping.huang/emc.para/com/aqm/v7.0/aqm.v7.0.c22.20221206/06 ? The timestamp marked is around Dec 8 04:55. |
|
@ho-chun Huang ***@***.***> Sorry for the confusion. I am
asking whether you are able to read the new grib2 files including PBLH and
AOD created by Wen since you asked about these two products.
…On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 10:04 AM Ho-Chun Huang ***@***.***> wrote:
@JianpingHuang-NOAA <https://github.com/JianpingHuang-NOAA>
I do not understand the task you want me to perform. Please clarify;
Do you want me to test read on the
aqm.t06z.pm25.f##.793.grib2
aqm.t06z.awpozcon.f##793.grib2
aqm.t06z.max_8hr_o3.793.grib2
aqm.t06z.ave_24hr_pm25.793.grib
of
/lfs/h2/emc/ptmp/jianping.huang/emc.para/com/aqm/v7.0/aqm.v7.0.c22.20221206/06
?
The timestamp marked is around Dec 8 04:55.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#591 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANA2PI4SRPZOJJQDVHP7PWTWMH2GZANCNFSM6AAAAAASAEHK6M>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
@JianpingHuang-NOAA @Ho-ChunHuang-NOAA I rename c20 test as /u/wen.meng/ptmp/post_aqm_2022112706-c20 on cactus |
|
Hi,
using /lfs/h2/emc/ptmp/jianping.huang/emc.para/com/aqm/v7.0/aqm.v7.0.c22.20221206/06/aqm.t06z.cmaq.f###.793.grib2
?
I saw 577:112927127:vt=2022120906:surface:72 hour fcst:PBLREG Planetary
Boundary Layer Regime [-]:
I did not see AOTK or AOD.
Ho-Chun Huang, Ph.D.
Physical Scientist III, Contractor with Lynker in Support of
NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC, U.S. Department of Commerce
5830 University Research Ct., Rm. 2792
College Park, MD 20740
***@***.*** ***@***.***>
301-683-3958
…On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 10:44 AM WenMeng-NOAA ***@***.***> wrote:
@JianpingHuang-NOAA <https://github.com/JianpingHuang-NOAA>
@Ho-ChunHuang-NOAA <https://github.com/Ho-ChunHuang-NOAA>
The new test from c22 model files is at
/u/wen.meng/ptmp/post_aqm_2022120606-c22 on cactus
I rename c20 test as /u/wen.meng/ptmp/post_aqm_2022112706-c20 on cactus
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#591 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALPHE3CWP7HICANCXLG6M5DWMH635ANCNFSM6AAAAAASAEHK6M>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
@Ho-ChunHuang-NOAA Please check the following two directories:
|
|
@wen Meng - NOAA Federal ***@***.***> @haixia Liu - NOAA Affiliate
***@***.***> @jianping Huang - NOAA Affiliate
***@***.***>
I do not know which one to check in /u/wen.meng/ptmp/post_aqm_2022120606-c22
Which one is the grib2 output?
*Am I the qualified person to do this checking?* I can only check the
v70c22 output grib2 file for verification.
i.e., aqm.t06z.cmaq.f###.793.grib2.
Ho-Chun Huang, Ph.D.
Physical Scientist III, Contractor with Lynker in Support of
NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC, U.S. Department of Commerce
5830 University Research Ct., Rm. 2792
College Park, MD 20740
***@***.*** ***@***.***>
301-683-3958
…On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 10:59 AM WenMeng-NOAA ***@***.***> wrote:
@Ho-ChunHuang-NOAA <https://github.com/Ho-ChunHuang-NOAA> Please check
the following two directories:
The new test from c22 model files is at
/u/wen.meng/ptmp/post_aqm_2022120606-c22 on cactus
I rename c20 test as /u/wen.meng/ptmp/post_aqm_2022112706-c20 on cactus
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#591 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALPHE3FMAI6424DM2WSM3SLWMIAWRANCNFSM6AAAAAASAEHK6M>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
and HPBL in aqm control files; 3)remove fv3lam_cmaq control files.
|
@JianpingHuang-NOAA @KaiWang-NOAA |
KaiWang-NOAA
left a comment
KaiWang-NOAA
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@WenMeng-NOAA In addition to the two minor comments I had earlier. There seems to be some issue with the sample output in /u/wen.meng/ptmp/post_aqm_2022112706/CMAQ60.tm00 for HPBL.
The degrib2 CMAQ60.tm00 shows "PARAMETER = UNKNOWN 0 3 18" for the variable name while the variable name (i.e., HPBL) seems to be ok when using wgrib2 to display the file. The values for HPBL are reasonable, i.e.,
"MIN= 18.29436111 AVE= 676.61242676 MAX= 3434.37426758"
@KaiWang-NOAA Thanks for catching this. There are two HPBL in grib2 table. The degrib2 can't display the one with 18. We might consider to unify them in the future. For this case, I updated AQM control files via using NCEP local number 196. The new test case can be found at /u/wen.meng/ptmp/post_aqm_2022112706 on dogwood. Please verify it. |
Thanks for fixing the issue! The new output looks good to me now. |
|
@KaiWang-NOAA I added the changes based your comments about the aod ouput. The new test case is at |
@WenMeng-NOAA Thank you for adding the changes quickly! The new output looks good to me now. |
|
@JianpingHuang-NOAA and @KaiWang-NOAA I will start the PR testing and merging process soon. Please let me know if you will additional comments. |
|
The UPP RT tests were completed on WCOSS2. No changed results. |
AlexanderRichert-NOAA
left a comment
AlexanderRichert-NOAA
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CI looks good.
WenMeng-NOAA
added
the
No Baseline Change
|
The UPP RT tests were completed on Hera and Orion. No baseline changes are needed. |
HuiyaChuang-NOAA
left a comment
HuiyaChuang-NOAA
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggest adding one line comment in MDLFLD.f that new AQ variables are computed as hourly average only.
Great job cleaning up 3D local variables in INITPOST_NETCDF.f
* fixes for land coupling * work to support external land component side-by-side config * fix issue with ort dbg test
6 participants
The main changes are: