Miscellaneous GSL updates#582
Conversation
|
@EricJames-NOAA Can you add change logs in all source code files you modified under sorc/ncep_post.fd/? |
|
@EricJames-NOAA Do you have any new RRFS model output files in netcdf for my UPP standalone test? |
|
@WenMeng-NOAA yes on Jet...I can provide the path. If you can't access Jet I can copy to Hera. /lfs4/BMC/wrfruc/ejames/RRFS/stmp/tmpnwprd/RRFS_conus_3km/2022102713/fcst_fv3lam |
@EricJames-NOAA Got it. Thanks! |
|
@EricJames-NOAA Are ffg_*grib2 files required for generating GWLOWS products 912-922? If yes, can you provide the location? |
@WenMeng-NOAA yes they are. We have the FFG GRIB2 files on Jet for all of our realtime systems in NOAA GSL: /public/data/grids/ncep/ffg/grib2 I'm not sure if they are available on other machines...but the code is set up to skip these fields if the FFG files are not available. |
|
@EricJames-NOAA I conducted the UPP standalone test with new model history files you provided. My test is at /scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Wen.Meng/rrfs_2022102713. There are only 801 records in PRSLEV dataset. I also saw the error message in PRSLEV file dump as: |
@WenMeng-NOAA thanks for your test. I don't see that error using wgrib2 version 0.1.9.6a. Let me see if I can get rid of that error message. |
@WenMeng-NOAA looks like there is a section of SURFCE.f which uses the same IGET value (922) as my new average recurrence interval exceedance (lines 5636-5647), but I didn't see that IGET value defined in any post_avblflds.xml prior to my code change. Do you have a recommendation for how to correct this issue? |
@EricJames-NOAA Thanks for catching this undefined UPP ID issue. It seems the CD10 and CH10 are not generated in any NCEP products right now. You may change 922 to 924 in the section starting at line 5636. |
@WenMeng-NOAA thanks. I think my latest commit with this change gets rid of the error. |
|
@EricJames-NOAA Great! I updated my UPP version and reran the test at /scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Wen.Meng/rrfs_2022102713. Now PRSLEV dataset looks good to me. Can you take a look my test and let me know if there are any unexpected results. |
@WenMeng-NOAA it looks good to me! Thanks! |
|
The UPP RT tests were conducted on Hera. The changed results for RTMA are: @EricJames-NOAA and @EdwardColon-NOAA I would think the above changes come from the bug fix in storm-relative helicity. Could you confirm that? |
@WenMeng-NOAA I confirm it! Yes, those are the fields we expect to be affected by the storm relative helicity bug fix. |
|
@EricJames-NOAA Can you sync your branch with upstream/develop? The procedure can be found at https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/UPP/wiki/UPP-Code-Development#update-your-branch-at-your-fork-with-branch-develop-at-authoritative-repository |
|
The UPP RT tests were completed on WCOSS2, Hera and Orion. The baseline for RTMA will be recreated with this PR. |
This PR includes assorted changes from NOAA-GSL RRFS_dev branch. The changes include:
(1) Enabling of QPF comparisons with average recurrence intervals (ARIs) in RRFS
(2) Bug fix for calculation of storm-relative helicity from Edward Colon
(3) Addition of a missing value check for updraft helicity
(4) Enabling soil moisture availability output in RRFS (wet1)
(5) Fixing GRIB2 encoding for some time-average variables which were causing errors for some wgrib2 versions
Regression tests were carried out on Hera; the only differences seen are those expected from the SRH bug fix from Edward Colon, which also affects some RTMA diagnostics variables.