Update README.md#66
Conversation
|
Please check with Wen and George on the version numbers. I think George is
referring it to as ufs-v1.0.0 and Post has also made a decision to go with
ufs-v1.0.0 . Again please confirm.
…On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 10:41 AM Dom Heinzeller ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In README.md
<#66 (comment)>:
>
-`git submodule update --init --recursive`
+`git clone -b ufs-v1.0.0 --recursive https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/NCEPLIBS` <https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/NCEPLIBS>
According to Arun, the branch will be deleted at some point, but the tag
will stay (this PR will be retagged as ufs-v1.0.0).
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#66?email_source=notifications&email_token=AL5NYI6Q3DX27XX4SVWNH2TRGUE2PA5CNFSM4LEKB5O2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWFIHK3DMKJSXC5LFON2FEZLWNFSXPKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOCYQLD2I#discussion_r389734020>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL5NYIZWUEXGLCLHJ2RWPFLRGUE2PANCNFSM4LEKB5OQ>
.
|
|
@WenMeng-NOAA @GeorgeGayno-NOAA can you please help clarify which version numbers we should use for the UFS public release? The VERSION files in EMC_post and UFS_UTILS say 8.0.0 and 1.1.1, but apparently those should both be 1.0.0? Thanks! |
@aerorahul You added the version file. What is that file documenting? |
|
@climbfuji For EMC_post repos, use ufs-v1.0.0. I added @fossell for double confirming. |
|
@aerorahul Will you update the VERSION file at EMC_post with 1.0.0? |
|
I can make those updates for both EMC_post and UFS_UTILS. |
|
@climbfuji @GeorgeGayno-NOAA - Confirming @WenMeng-NOAA comment, UPP has decided to use tag "ufs-v1.0.0" of EMC_post for UFS release. So version number is 1.0.0. |
|
Associated PRs (need to be merged first, then need to update submodule pointers here): |
@GeorgeGayno-NOAA The file |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.