Remove unnecessary SIMD instruction sets from CMakeLists.txt#539
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Dec 31, 2020
climbfuji
requested review from
JulieSchramm,
grantfirl and
llpcarson
as code owners
llpcarson
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2021
Contributor
llpcarson
left a comment
llpcarson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks good to me, approved
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When option
SIMDMULTIARCHis used at compile time (currently only on Jet), four SIMD instruction sets are compiled into the executable. The ccpp-physics top-levelCMakeLists.txtperforms some modification of these optimization flags for certain files.Also included: update of an SCM-only file that was already merged into the repository, see #541.
Associated PRs:
#539
NOAA-EMC/GFDL_atmos_cubed_sphere#49
NOAA-EMC/ufsatm#220
ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#353
For regression testing, see ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#353.