Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation request #2806

Closed
scotch83 opened this issue Apr 17, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed

Documentation request #2806

scotch83 opened this issue Apr 17, 2018 · 7 comments

Comments

@scotch83
Copy link

Request for MvvmCross Reference documentation

Hello,

it would be nice if possible to have a reference of the framework like a standard language reference.

Like this:
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/Manifest.permission.html
With all the classes and methods and related descriptions and use.

Thank you

@younas-bangash
Copy link

one of the best platform and it have worst documentation mostly their webpages are down

@Cheesebaron
Copy link
Member

Cheesebaron commented Apr 19, 2018

@younas-bangash your comment isn't appreciated. Instead of going from issue to issue and flaming us, I suggest you leave constructive criticism instead. I.e. it would be better to point out which exact part is down or is unclear.

@scotch83 this has been discussed before. This would require us to add XML docs to every public method and class. The amount of stuff having to be maintained is way too much for us with the amount of resources we have right now.

@nickrandolph
Copy link
Contributor

@Cheesebaron well said - I'm going to close this issue as we already have documentation as a TODO.
@younas-bangash we're always looking for volunteers - please submit PRs to include appropriate documentation instead of raising issues with thing you'd like to see
@scotch83 we're always conscious of the need for documentation but there is a massive trade off between documentation and implementing features and bugs. As you can see from the commit history the bulk of the work is done by only a few people. We'd love more assistance in the form of PRs rather than issues outlining a wishlis of features.

@younas-bangash
Copy link

younas-bangash commented Apr 21, 2018

@Cheesebaron accept my apology if my comment is not proper my point is not to criticise anyone if you feel that then again I apologize for that

@scotch83
Copy link
Author

scotch83 commented Apr 28, 2018 via email

@nickrandolph
Copy link
Contributor

@scotch83 there's no problem creating the issue so that we have something to track requests for documentation against (even if we then close the issue). As @Cheesebaron mentioned we need to be careful about adding more maintenance (usually what happens with generators) which just won't happen.
Take for example we'd all love to have complete test coverage, and so the question becomes: are we adding more value by writing documentation, fixing bugs, adding features or writing tests. Usually bug fixing wins in nearly every case.
We'd love for the community to contribute back by adding documentation they find useful.

@scotch83
Copy link
Author

scotch83 commented Apr 29, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants