Skip to content

Conversation

qaehtesh
Copy link
Contributor

Clarify that Conditional Access does not apply to Windows sign-in processes. we already call this out in our sign-in logs docs but not in our core CA docs yet.

Clarify that Conditional Access does not apply to Windows sign-in processes. we already call this out in our sign-in logs docs but not in our core CA docs yet.
Copy link
Contributor

@qaehtesh : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit d53145c:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/identity/conditional-access/concept-conditional-access-cloud-apps.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@v-dirichards v-dirichards requested a review from Copilot October 10, 2025 14:56
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds clarification to the Conditional Access documentation regarding its applicability to Windows sign-in processes. The update emphasizes that Conditional Access does not apply to Windows sign-in methods like Windows Hello for Business, but rather protects sign-in attempts to cloud resources.

  • Adds a note clarifying Conditional Access scope limitations for Windows sign-in processes

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@MicrosoftGuyJFlo

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants