Skip to content

Conversation

rfernandezdo
Copy link
Contributor

Clarify usage of wildcard character in 'contains' and 'notContains' conditions.

Clarify usage of wildcard character in 'contains' and 'notContains' conditions.
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 14, 2025 10:56
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates documentation to clarify wildcard character usage in policy rule conditions, specifically distinguishing between contains/notContains and like/notLike conditions.

  • Added clarification that wildcard characters (*) cannot be used in contains and notContains conditions

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

Copy link
Contributor

@rfernandezdo : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 7d8d29d:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/governance/policy/concepts/definition-structure-policy-rule.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@rmcmurray

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Oct 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants