Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bugfix for json-rpc-middleware-stream incorrect notification handling #4427

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

kanthesha
Copy link
Contributor

Explanation

json-rpc-middleware-stream detects notifications by checking if response.id is falsy, when it should rather check if hasProperty(response, 'id') is false.

References

Fixes #4308

Changelog

@metamask/json-rpc-middleware-stream

  • FIXED: Incorrect notification handling

Checklist

  • I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
  • I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or updated code as appropriate
  • I've highlighted breaking changes using the "BREAKING" category above as appropriate

@kanthesha kanthesha marked this pull request as ready for review June 14, 2024 11:14
@kanthesha kanthesha requested a review from a team as a code owner June 14, 2024 11:14
@kanthesha kanthesha merged commit dc14794 into main Jun 18, 2024
116 checks passed
@kanthesha kanthesha deleted the bug/incorrect-notification-handling branch June 18, 2024 09:47
staging-devin-ai-integration bot pushed a commit to Devin-Applications/core-devin that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
…MetaMask#4427)

## Explanation
json-rpc-middleware-stream detects notifications by checking if
response.id is falsy, when it should rather check if
hasProperty(response, 'id') is false.
<!--
Thanks for your contribution! Take a moment to answer these questions so
that reviewers have the information they need to properly understand
your changes:

* What is the current state of things and why does it need to change?
* What is the solution your changes offer and how does it work?
* Are there any changes whose purpose might not obvious to those
unfamiliar with the domain?
* If your primary goal was to update one package but you found you had
to update another one along the way, why did you do so?
* If you had to upgrade a dependency, why did you do so?
-->

## References
Fixes MetaMask#4308 
<!--
Are there any issues that this pull request is tied to? Are there other
links that reviewers should consult to understand these changes better?

For example:

* Fixes #12345
* Related to #67890
-->

## Changelog

<!--
If you're making any consumer-facing changes, list those changes here as
if you were updating a changelog, using the template below as a guide.

(CATEGORY is one of BREAKING, ADDED, CHANGED, DEPRECATED, REMOVED, or
FIXED. For security-related issues, follow the Security Advisory
process.)

Please take care to name the exact pieces of the API you've added or
changed (e.g. types, interfaces, functions, or methods).

If there are any breaking changes, make sure to offer a solution for
consumers to follow once they upgrade to the changes.

Finally, if you're only making changes to development scripts or tests,
you may replace the template below with "None".
-->

### `@metamask/json-rpc-middleware-stream`

- **FIXED**: Incorrect notification handling

## Checklist

- [ ] I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or
updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've highlighted breaking changes using the "BREAKING" category
above as appropriate

Co-authored-by: legobeat <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

json-rpc-middleware-stream: Incorrect notification handling
2 participants