Skip to content

CmPivot_Utility #27

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 9, 2023
Merged

CmPivot_Utility #27

merged 5 commits into from
May 9, 2023

Conversation

DiLomSec1
Copy link
Contributor

@DiLomSec1 DiLomSec1 commented May 9, 2023

Description

Please summarize the change, which issue is fixed, and any dependencies required, including any relevant motivation and context.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Testing

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes and confirm that no regressions were introduced and describe the results you observed. Provide instructions so we can reproduce and list any relevant details for your test configuration.

  • Test A
  • Test B

Test Configuration:

  • SCCM Site Version (result of.\SharpSCCM.exe get class-instances SMS_Site -p Version):
  • SCCM Client Version (result of .\SharpSCCM_merged.exe local class-instances SMS_Client):

Bonus Points:

DiLomSec1 added 5 commits May 8, 2023 14:10
Added function InitiateClientOperationExMethodCall and modified rest of file to make use of SMS Provider method call as a fallback when a call to FileContent breaks the query syntax as part of normal CMPivot behavior it seems
Modified admin-service implementation to pass the correct variables to the method to call InitiateClientOperationEx within AdminService.cs
Toke out debugging output calls
@Mayyhem
Copy link
Owner

Mayyhem commented May 9, 2023

looks good

@Mayyhem Mayyhem merged commit 203d63c into Mayyhem:main May 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants