Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rust: Upgrade to 1.83.0 #30872

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ParkMyCar
Copy link
Member

@ParkMyCar ParkMyCar commented Dec 19, 2024

This PR does two things:

  1. Upgrades the version of Rust we use to 1.83.0, and fixes a bunch of clippy lints
  2. Expands the instructions in upgrade-rust.md to include how to upgrade Rust for Bazel

Motivation

Get us on a newest version of Rust

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

@ParkMyCar ParkMyCar marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2024 18:46
@ParkMyCar ParkMyCar requested review from a team, aljoscha and jkosh44 as code owners December 20, 2024 18:46
Copy link
Contributor

@jkosh44 jkosh44 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment on lines +329 to +332
type DatumIter<'short>
= DatumSeq<'short>
where
Self: 'short;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lol, how does rustfmt find this better

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants