Add Multi Unit Support for Max7219 to bugfix_2.0.0#11285
Add Multi Unit Support for Max7219 to bugfix_2.0.0#11285Roxy-3D merged 3 commits intoMarlinFirmware:bugfix-2.0.xfrom Roxy-3D:bugfix-2.0.x
Conversation
|
@thinkyhead Can you give guidance? I'm not sure what I'm fighting. But GitHub Desktop forced an update to a new version. And one of the files had a warning saying line endings were changed from New-Line to Carrage-Return / New-Line. I'm pretty sure I didn't do that. I think it is in the repository that way. |
…16 or more LED's Change Max7219_idle_task() routines to use single line if X-Axis has 16 or more LED's This gets bugfix_1.1.x at parity with #11285 when it gets merged.
|
Seems teensy35 build is failing due to a missing include path... |
|
An update to the L6470 library broke Travis CI testing. I patched the issue, and will follow up with testing to see that the library still functions otherwise. |
|
Thanks! I'll just wait patiently for this to be merged. I believe it is all correct. It compiles clean for the AVR's. And it looks like Travis is now saying "All checks have passed." But I'll wait for you to merge it. |
|
This should be safe to merge... I'm confused about what you did with the example config files. I'm pretty sure I updated all the config files prior to doing the Pull Request. Those should have had the extra line: in all the files????? |
|
Now to clean up the In this case... The Queue depth and head and tail pointer are better done on a column instead of a row. |
…16 or more LED's Change Max7219_idle_task() routines to use single line if X-Axis has 16 or more LED's This gets bugfix_1.1.x at parity with #11285 when it gets merged.
3 participants
Get parity with bugfix_1.1.x with respect to supporting more than 1 Max7219 in a chain.
Updated Max7219_idle() routine coming next using 16 LED's in row if available (instead of two lines of 8 LED's)