-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
random QQ #999
Comments
I was going to report the same for ZZ, but seems like they are related:
|
One possible problem with changing the behavior of "random" is that tests that use it may fail. |
This is true, but might be worth the pain.
… On Sep 19, 2019, at 10:51 AM, Daniel R. Grayson ***@***.***> wrote:
One possible problem with changing the behavior of "random" is that tests that use it may fail.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#999?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAAY6R4T3ZEJKNDU3ZF5ZNDQKM4RDA5CNFSM4IXAMRR2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7CXKBY#issuecomment-533034247>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAY6R2YDH6BCE5PGJP6BFLQKM4RDANCNFSM4IXAMRRQ>.
|
I've thought about implementing a better random ZZ (and hence QQ) where the number is created out of some distribution on the integers. Is someone else already implementing this or something similar in some package? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Frank Schreyer would like "random QQ" to yield negative numbers about half the time (currently, none are provided) and that the various numbers occur with equal probability (currently, fractions of small height occur more often).
Moreover, when working with polynomial rings over the rationals, it seems senseless to provide any denominators:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: