Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MIPS: dts: unit address should not have 0x prefix #84

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: ci20-v3.18
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

malaterre
Copy link

The implied format for most bus bindings implies the uname-address
part of the unit-name should be in hex without a leading 0x.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre [email protected]

The implied format for most bus bindings implies the uname-address
part of the unit-name should be in hex without a leading 0x.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>
gabrielesvelto pushed a commit to gabrielesvelto/CI20_linux that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2019
[ Upstream commit 4f4b374 ]

This is the much more correct fix for my earlier attempt at:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/10/118

Short recap:

- There's not actually a locking issue, it's just lockdep being a bit
  too eager to complain about a possible deadlock.

- Contrary to what I claimed the real problem is recursion on
  kn->count. Greg pointed me at sysfs_break_active_protection(), used
  by the scsi subsystem to allow a sysfs file to unbind itself. That
  would be a real deadlock, which isn't what's happening here. Also,
  breaking the active protection means we'd need to manually handle
  all the lifetime fun.

- With Rafael we discussed the task_work approach, which kinda works,
  but has two downsides: It's a functional change for a lockdep
  annotation issue, and it won't work for the bind file (which needs
  to get the errno from the driver load function back to userspace).

- Greg also asked why this never showed up: To hit this you need to
  unregister a 2nd driver from the unload code of your first driver. I
  guess only gpus do that. The bug has always been there, but only
  with a recent patch series did we add more locks so that lockdep
  built a chain from unbinding the snd-hda driver to the
  acpi_video_unregister call.

Full lockdep splat:

[12301.898799] ============================================
[12301.898805] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[12301.898811] 4.20.0-rc7+ MIPS#84 Not tainted
[12301.898815] --------------------------------------------
[12301.898821] bash/5297 is trying to acquire lock:
[12301.898826] 00000000f61c6093 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.898841] but task is already holding lock:
[12301.898847] 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190
[12301.898856] other info that might help us debug this:
[12301.898862]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[12301.898867]        CPU0
[12301.898870]        ----
[12301.898874]   lock(kn->count#39);
[12301.898879]   lock(kn->count#39);
[12301.898883] *** DEADLOCK ***
[12301.898891]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[12301.898899] 5 locks held by bash/5297:
[12301.898903]  #0: 00000000cd800e54 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0
[12301.898915]  MIPS#1: 000000000465e7c2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xd3/0x190
[12301.898925]  MIPS#2: 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190
[12301.898936]  MIPS#3: 00000000414ef7ac (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x34/0x240
[12301.898950]  MIPS#4: 000000003218fbdf (register_count_mutex){+.+.}, at: acpi_video_unregister+0xe/0x40
[12301.898960] stack backtrace:
[12301.898968] CPU: 1 PID: 5297 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.20.0-rc7+ MIPS#84
[12301.898974] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 8460p/161C, BIOS 68SCF Ver. F.01 03/11/2011
[12301.898982] Call Trace:
[12301.898989]  dump_stack+0x67/0x9b
[12301.898997]  __lock_acquire+0x6ad/0x1410
[12301.899003]  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899010]  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
[12301.899017]  ? mutex_spin_on_owner+0xe4/0x150
[12301.899023]  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
[12301.899030]  ? lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
[12301.899036]  lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
[12301.899042]  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899049]  __kernfs_remove+0x296/0x310
[12301.899055]  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899060]  ? kernfs_name_hash+0xd/0x80
[12301.899066]  ? kernfs_find_ns+0x6c/0x100
[12301.899073]  kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899080]  bus_remove_driver+0x92/0xa0
[12301.899085]  acpi_video_unregister+0x24/0x40
[12301.899127]  i915_driver_unload+0x42/0x130 [i915]
[12301.899160]  i915_pci_remove+0x19/0x30 [i915]
[12301.899169]  pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0
[12301.899176]  device_release_driver_internal+0x185/0x240
[12301.899183]  unbind_store+0xaf/0x180
[12301.899189]  kernfs_fop_write+0x104/0x190
[12301.899195]  __vfs_write+0x31/0x180
[12301.899203]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80
[12301.899209]  ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x29/0x50
[12301.899216]  ? __sb_start_write+0x13c/0x1a0
[12301.899221]  ? vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0
[12301.899227]  vfs_write+0xb9/0x1b0
[12301.899233]  ksys_write+0x50/0xc0
[12301.899239]  do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x180
[12301.899247]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[12301.899253] RIP: 0033:0x7f452ac7f7a4
[12301.899259] Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 8b 05 aa f0 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 55 53 48 89 d5 48 89 f3 48 83
[12301.899273] RSP: 002b:00007ffceafa6918 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[12301.899282] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007f452ac7f7a4
[12301.899288] RDX: 000000000000000d RSI: 00005612a1abf7c0 RDI: 0000000000000001
[12301.899295] RBP: 00005612a1abf7c0 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00005612a1c46730
[12301.899301] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000000d
[12301.899308] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f452af4a740 R15: 000000000000000d

Looking around I've noticed that usb and i2c already handle similar
recursion problems, where a sysfs file can unbind the same type of
sysfs somewhere else in the hierarchy. Relevant commits are:

commit 356c05d
Author: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon May 14 13:30:03 2012 -0400

    sysfs: get rid of some lockdep false positives

commit e9b526f
Author: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri May 17 14:56:35 2013 +0200

    i2c: suppress lockdep warning on delete_device

Implement the same trick for driver bind/unbind.

v2: Put the macro into bus.c (Greg).

Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Cc: Ramalingam C <[email protected]>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <[email protected]>
Cc: Vivek Gautam <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
pcercuei pushed a commit to OpenDingux/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2019
[ Upstream commit 4f4b374 ]

This is the much more correct fix for my earlier attempt at:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/10/118

Short recap:

- There's not actually a locking issue, it's just lockdep being a bit
  too eager to complain about a possible deadlock.

- Contrary to what I claimed the real problem is recursion on
  kn->count. Greg pointed me at sysfs_break_active_protection(), used
  by the scsi subsystem to allow a sysfs file to unbind itself. That
  would be a real deadlock, which isn't what's happening here. Also,
  breaking the active protection means we'd need to manually handle
  all the lifetime fun.

- With Rafael we discussed the task_work approach, which kinda works,
  but has two downsides: It's a functional change for a lockdep
  annotation issue, and it won't work for the bind file (which needs
  to get the errno from the driver load function back to userspace).

- Greg also asked why this never showed up: To hit this you need to
  unregister a 2nd driver from the unload code of your first driver. I
  guess only gpus do that. The bug has always been there, but only
  with a recent patch series did we add more locks so that lockdep
  built a chain from unbinding the snd-hda driver to the
  acpi_video_unregister call.

Full lockdep splat:

[12301.898799] ============================================
[12301.898805] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[12301.898811] 4.20.0-rc7+ MIPS#84 Not tainted
[12301.898815] --------------------------------------------
[12301.898821] bash/5297 is trying to acquire lock:
[12301.898826] 00000000f61c6093 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.898841] but task is already holding lock:
[12301.898847] 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190
[12301.898856] other info that might help us debug this:
[12301.898862]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[12301.898867]        CPU0
[12301.898870]        ----
[12301.898874]   lock(kn->count#39);
[12301.898879]   lock(kn->count#39);
[12301.898883] *** DEADLOCK ***
[12301.898891]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[12301.898899] 5 locks held by bash/5297:
[12301.898903]  #0: 00000000cd800e54 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0
[12301.898915]  #1: 000000000465e7c2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xd3/0x190
[12301.898925]  #2: 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190
[12301.898936]  #3: 00000000414ef7ac (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x34/0x240
[12301.898950]  #4: 000000003218fbdf (register_count_mutex){+.+.}, at: acpi_video_unregister+0xe/0x40
[12301.898960] stack backtrace:
[12301.898968] CPU: 1 PID: 5297 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.20.0-rc7+ MIPS#84
[12301.898974] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 8460p/161C, BIOS 68SCF Ver. F.01 03/11/2011
[12301.898982] Call Trace:
[12301.898989]  dump_stack+0x67/0x9b
[12301.898997]  __lock_acquire+0x6ad/0x1410
[12301.899003]  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899010]  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
[12301.899017]  ? mutex_spin_on_owner+0xe4/0x150
[12301.899023]  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
[12301.899030]  ? lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
[12301.899036]  lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
[12301.899042]  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899049]  __kernfs_remove+0x296/0x310
[12301.899055]  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899060]  ? kernfs_name_hash+0xd/0x80
[12301.899066]  ? kernfs_find_ns+0x6c/0x100
[12301.899073]  kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899080]  bus_remove_driver+0x92/0xa0
[12301.899085]  acpi_video_unregister+0x24/0x40
[12301.899127]  i915_driver_unload+0x42/0x130 [i915]
[12301.899160]  i915_pci_remove+0x19/0x30 [i915]
[12301.899169]  pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0
[12301.899176]  device_release_driver_internal+0x185/0x240
[12301.899183]  unbind_store+0xaf/0x180
[12301.899189]  kernfs_fop_write+0x104/0x190
[12301.899195]  __vfs_write+0x31/0x180
[12301.899203]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80
[12301.899209]  ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x29/0x50
[12301.899216]  ? __sb_start_write+0x13c/0x1a0
[12301.899221]  ? vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0
[12301.899227]  vfs_write+0xb9/0x1b0
[12301.899233]  ksys_write+0x50/0xc0
[12301.899239]  do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x180
[12301.899247]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[12301.899253] RIP: 0033:0x7f452ac7f7a4
[12301.899259] Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 8b 05 aa f0 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 55 53 48 89 d5 48 89 f3 48 83
[12301.899273] RSP: 002b:00007ffceafa6918 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[12301.899282] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007f452ac7f7a4
[12301.899288] RDX: 000000000000000d RSI: 00005612a1abf7c0 RDI: 0000000000000001
[12301.899295] RBP: 00005612a1abf7c0 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00005612a1c46730
[12301.899301] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000000d
[12301.899308] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f452af4a740 R15: 000000000000000d

Looking around I've noticed that usb and i2c already handle similar
recursion problems, where a sysfs file can unbind the same type of
sysfs somewhere else in the hierarchy. Relevant commits are:

commit 356c05d
Author: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon May 14 13:30:03 2012 -0400

    sysfs: get rid of some lockdep false positives

commit e9b526f
Author: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri May 17 14:56:35 2013 +0200

    i2c: suppress lockdep warning on delete_device

Implement the same trick for driver bind/unbind.

v2: Put the macro into bus.c (Greg).

Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Cc: Ramalingam C <[email protected]>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <[email protected]>
Cc: Vivek Gautam <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
pcercuei pushed a commit to OpenDingux/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
In process_slab(), "p = get_freepointer()" could return a tagged
pointer, but "addr = page_address()" always return a native pointer.  As
the result, slab_index() is messed up here,

    return (p - addr) / s->size;

All other callers of slab_index() have the same situation where "addr"
is from page_address(), so just need to untag "p".

    # cat /sys/kernel/slab/hugetlbfs_inode_cache/alloc_calls

    Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 2bff808aa4856d48
    Mem abort info:
      ESR = 0x96000007
      Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
      SET = 0, FnV = 0
      EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
    Data abort info:
      ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007
      CM = 0, WnR = 0
    swapper pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 0000000002498338
    [2bff808aa4856d48] pgd=00000097fcfd0003, pud=00000097fcfd0003, pmd=00000097fca30003, pte=00e8008b24850712
    Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP
    CPU: 3 PID: 79210 Comm: read_all Tainted: G             L    5.0.0-rc7+ MIPS#84
    Hardware name: HPE Apollo 70             /C01_APACHE_MB         , BIOS L50_5.13_1.0.6 07/10/2018
    pstate: 00400089 (nzcv daIf +PAN -UAO)
    pc : get_map+0x78/0xec
    lr : get_map+0xa0/0xec
    sp : aeff808989e3f8e0
    x29: aeff808989e3f940 x28: ffff800826200000
    x27: ffff100012d47000 x26: 9700000000002500
    x25: 0000000000000001 x24: 52ff8008200131f8
    x23: 52ff8008200130a0 x22: 52ff800820013098
    x21: ffff800826200000 x20: ffff100013172ba0
    x19: 2bff808a8971bc00 x18: ffff1000148f5538
    x17: 000000000000001b x16: 00000000000000ff
    x15: ffff1000148f5000 x14: 00000000000000d2
    x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000
    x11: 0000000020000002 x10: 2bff808aa4856d48
    x9 : 0000020000000000 x8 : 68ff80082620ebb0
    x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff1000105da1dc
    x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
    x3 : 0000000000000010 x2 : 2bff808a8971bc00
    x1 : ffff7fe002098800 x0 : ffff80082620ceb0
    Process read_all (pid: 79210, stack limit = 0x00000000f65b9361)
    Call trace:
     get_map+0x78/0xec
     process_slab+0x7c/0x47c
     list_locations+0xb0/0x3c8
     alloc_calls_show+0x34/0x40
     slab_attr_show+0x34/0x48
     sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x2e4/0x570
     kernfs_seq_show+0x12c/0x1a0
     seq_read+0x48c/0xf84
     kernfs_fop_read+0xd4/0x448
     __vfs_read+0x94/0x5d4
     vfs_read+0xcc/0x194
     ksys_read+0x6c/0xe8
     __arm64_sys_read+0x68/0xb0
     el0_svc_handler+0x230/0x3bc
     el0_svc+0x8/0xc
    Code: d3467d2a 9ac92329 8b0a0e6a f9800151 (c85f7d4b)
    ---[ end trace a383a9a44ff13176 ]---
    Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
    SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
    SMP: failed to stop secondary CPUs 1-7,32,40,127
    Kernel Offset: disabled
    CPU features: 0x002,20000c18
    Memory Limit: none
    ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]---

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
pcercuei pushed a commit to OpenDingux/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2019
This is the much more correct fix for my earlier attempt at:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/10/118

Short recap:

- There's not actually a locking issue, it's just lockdep being a bit
  too eager to complain about a possible deadlock.

- Contrary to what I claimed the real problem is recursion on
  kn->count. Greg pointed me at sysfs_break_active_protection(), used
  by the scsi subsystem to allow a sysfs file to unbind itself. That
  would be a real deadlock, which isn't what's happening here. Also,
  breaking the active protection means we'd need to manually handle
  all the lifetime fun.

- With Rafael we discussed the task_work approach, which kinda works,
  but has two downsides: It's a functional change for a lockdep
  annotation issue, and it won't work for the bind file (which needs
  to get the errno from the driver load function back to userspace).

- Greg also asked why this never showed up: To hit this you need to
  unregister a 2nd driver from the unload code of your first driver. I
  guess only gpus do that. The bug has always been there, but only
  with a recent patch series did we add more locks so that lockdep
  built a chain from unbinding the snd-hda driver to the
  acpi_video_unregister call.

Full lockdep splat:

[12301.898799] ============================================
[12301.898805] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[12301.898811] 4.20.0-rc7+ MIPS#84 Not tainted
[12301.898815] --------------------------------------------
[12301.898821] bash/5297 is trying to acquire lock:
[12301.898826] 00000000f61c6093 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.898841] but task is already holding lock:
[12301.898847] 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190
[12301.898856] other info that might help us debug this:
[12301.898862]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[12301.898867]        CPU0
[12301.898870]        ----
[12301.898874]   lock(kn->count#39);
[12301.898879]   lock(kn->count#39);
[12301.898883] *** DEADLOCK ***
[12301.898891]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[12301.898899] 5 locks held by bash/5297:
[12301.898903]  #0: 00000000cd800e54 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0
[12301.898915]  #1: 000000000465e7c2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xd3/0x190
[12301.898925]  #2: 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190
[12301.898936]  #3: 00000000414ef7ac (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x34/0x240
[12301.898950]  #4: 000000003218fbdf (register_count_mutex){+.+.}, at: acpi_video_unregister+0xe/0x40
[12301.898960] stack backtrace:
[12301.898968] CPU: 1 PID: 5297 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.20.0-rc7+ MIPS#84
[12301.898974] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 8460p/161C, BIOS 68SCF Ver. F.01 03/11/2011
[12301.898982] Call Trace:
[12301.898989]  dump_stack+0x67/0x9b
[12301.898997]  __lock_acquire+0x6ad/0x1410
[12301.899003]  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899010]  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
[12301.899017]  ? mutex_spin_on_owner+0xe4/0x150
[12301.899023]  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
[12301.899030]  ? lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
[12301.899036]  lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
[12301.899042]  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899049]  __kernfs_remove+0x296/0x310
[12301.899055]  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899060]  ? kernfs_name_hash+0xd/0x80
[12301.899066]  ? kernfs_find_ns+0x6c/0x100
[12301.899073]  kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80
[12301.899080]  bus_remove_driver+0x92/0xa0
[12301.899085]  acpi_video_unregister+0x24/0x40
[12301.899127]  i915_driver_unload+0x42/0x130 [i915]
[12301.899160]  i915_pci_remove+0x19/0x30 [i915]
[12301.899169]  pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0
[12301.899176]  device_release_driver_internal+0x185/0x240
[12301.899183]  unbind_store+0xaf/0x180
[12301.899189]  kernfs_fop_write+0x104/0x190
[12301.899195]  __vfs_write+0x31/0x180
[12301.899203]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80
[12301.899209]  ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x29/0x50
[12301.899216]  ? __sb_start_write+0x13c/0x1a0
[12301.899221]  ? vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0
[12301.899227]  vfs_write+0xb9/0x1b0
[12301.899233]  ksys_write+0x50/0xc0
[12301.899239]  do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x180
[12301.899247]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[12301.899253] RIP: 0033:0x7f452ac7f7a4
[12301.899259] Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 8b 05 aa f0 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 55 53 48 89 d5 48 89 f3 48 83
[12301.899273] RSP: 002b:00007ffceafa6918 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[12301.899282] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007f452ac7f7a4
[12301.899288] RDX: 000000000000000d RSI: 00005612a1abf7c0 RDI: 0000000000000001
[12301.899295] RBP: 00005612a1abf7c0 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00005612a1c46730
[12301.899301] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000000d
[12301.899308] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f452af4a740 R15: 000000000000000d

Locking around I've noticed that usb and i2c already handle similar
recursion problems, where a sysfs file can unbind the same type of
sysfs somewhere else in the hierarchy. Relevant commits are:

commit 356c05d
Author: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon May 14 13:30:03 2012 -0400

    sysfs: get rid of some lockdep false positives

commit e9b526f
Author: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri May 17 14:56:35 2013 +0200

    i2c: suppress lockdep warning on delete_device

Implement the same trick for driver bind/unbind.

v2: Put the macro into bus.c (Greg).

Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Ramalingam C <[email protected]>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <[email protected]>
Cc: Vivek Gautam <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>

Note that Greg already merged this, so this should drop out as soon as
we've moved forward past 4.21-rc1.
-Daniel
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant