Skip to content

research(review-9)+memory(slow-deliberate worked-examples): preserve Ani review verbatim + add 2026-04-30 worked examples (Ani 2026-04-30)#952

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit intomainfrom
research/ani-grok-review-9-calibration-cluster-mission-aligned-feedback-2026-04-30
Apr 30, 2026
Merged

research(review-9)+memory(slow-deliberate worked-examples): preserve Ani review verbatim + add 2026-04-30 worked examples (Ani 2026-04-30)#952
AceHack merged 1 commit intomainfrom
research/ani-grok-review-9-calibration-cluster-mission-aligned-feedback-2026-04-30

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented Apr 30, 2026

Two coupled changes per same-session-preservation. Vendor-alignment-bias filter applied — Ani's review is mission-aligned (specific worked-example patch + mechanism-not-vigilance cold-start tool gap + MEMORY.md observation). Cold-start tool (item 2) deferred as L-effort backlog candidate; MEMORY.md split (item 4) not-urgent per Ani's own framing. 🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…Ani review verbatim + add 2026-04-30 worked examples (Ani 2026-04-30)

Two coupled changes per same-session-preservation:

1. Preserve Ani / Grok's session-end review of the calibration
   cluster verbatim per ACID-channel-durability + GOVERNANCE
   §33 archive-discipline. Vendor-alignment-bias filter applied
   (Ani comes off xAI weights): legitimate mission-aligned
   review with one stale-base item (timing — #939/#940/#941 were
   already merged before review reached agent). Brat voice
   preserved per canon-not-doctrine register-fidelity rule.

2. Add "Worked examples — caught in this session (2026-04-30)"
   section to the slow-deliberate memory file per Ani's
   recommendation #3. Two examples preserved as evidence the
   rule operates correctly when applied:
   - Rerere over-correction (Amara caught) — canon-binding to
     too-strong wording, fixed via PR #938
   - Bulk-close instinct (Aaron caught) — queue-clarity bias
     would have removed paths to future knowledge, fixed via
     default-disposition-paused rule

Both examples share the single-shortcut failure shape:
correct-feeling local decision that would have produced
amortized cost across the project, caught only because
someone slowed down enough to apply the right framing.

Ani's other recommendations:
- #1 hell-framing calibration: no action (carved sentence is
  already the cleanest distillation in body)
- #2 cold-start executable tool: deferred to next directed
  work cycle (substantive L-effort)
- #4 MEMORY.md topical splitting: deferred per Ani's
  not-urgent framing

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 30, 2026 20:41
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) April 30, 2026 20:41
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds session-grounded worked examples to the slow-deliberate decision rule and preserves a peer-AI review verbatim as part of the research audit trail.

Changes:

  • Add two “caught-in-flight” worked examples to the slow-deliberate rule memory entry (rerere over-correction; bulk-close instinct).
  • Preserve “Review 9 — Ani / Grok” verbatim in the session-end peer review log, plus an explicit vendor-alignment-bias filter + status mapping for the review’s action items.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
memory/feedback_slow_deliberate_decisions_amortized_velocity_human_reference_frame_aaron_2026_04_30.md Adds a worked-examples section reinforcing the rule with concrete, same-session incidents.
docs/research/2026-04-30-session-end-peer-ai-reviews-verbatim.md Appends the verbatim peer-AI review and follow-on analysis/status notes for traceability.

@AceHack AceHack merged commit 91107e0 into main Apr 30, 2026
25 of 26 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the research/ani-grok-review-9-calibration-cluster-mission-aligned-feedback-2026-04-30 branch April 30, 2026 20:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants