-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
ops(0-0-0): ledger-flip after Batch 3a merge — 227→235 / 46→38 #841
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ Per `docs/active-trajectory.md` strict bucket taxonomy: classification requires | |||||
| |---|---|---|---| | ||||||
| | `memory/project_laptop_only_source_integration_scratch_sqlsharp_features_or_designs_high_priority_2026_04_27.md` | +8/-27 | **SAFE_TO_RESET_LFG_SUPERSEDES** | LFG has `cabaabe sync: AceHack→LFG bulk content forward-port + CI cadence split + Windows trajectory seed (#651)` (forward-port + cadence-split) and `6a2f08e substrate: laptop-only source integration (#642)` (LFG-side reapplication). AceHack-only `+8` lines drop the **closed-list-scope qualifier** from the `../scratch` / `../SQLSharp` zero-matches completion criterion. AceHack version: `git grep -- '../scratch' returns zero matches`. LFG version: `git grep -- '../scratch' returns zero matches *outside the closed-list history surfaces* (memory/**, docs/BACKLOG.md, docs/backlog/**, docs/research/**, ...)`. Without the qualifier, the criterion is **technically unsatisfiable** because grep would always hit references on the closed-list surfaces themselves (this very file is one of those surfaces). LFG version is more accurate AND rule-compliant; AceHack version is a simplification regression. | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Batch 3a result: 1 of 1 files SAFE_TO_RESET_LFG_SUPERSEDES.** (Post-merge of this PR — atomic with merge per decision-vs-resolution discipline. Ledger update from headline `classified_safe_lines = 227 → 235` and `unclassified_lines = 46 → 38` lands in a small follow-up PR after this PR merges; this PR holds the classification record only, not the ledger headline edit.) | ||||||
| **Batch 3a result (in-force as of #840 merge, 2026-04-29T12:54:53Z): 1 of 1 files SAFE_TO_RESET_LFG_SUPERSEDES.** Ledger headline flipped `classified_safe_lines = 227 → 235` and `unclassified_lines = 46 → 38` in the follow-up ledger-flip PR (per the two-PR split that avoids contingent-prose churn). | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Remaining unclassified after Batch 3a (38 lines / 1 file)**: `.github/workflows/budget-snapshot-cadence.yml` — has real behavioral divergence (auto-merge policy + Scorecard `TokenPermissionsID` security fix) requiring explicit Level-1 buddy review per the Second-Agent Design Review Gate (Amara 2026-04-29 packet 10) before classification. | ||||||
|
||||||
| **Remaining unclassified after Batch 3a (38 lines / 1 file)**: `.github/workflows/budget-snapshot-cadence.yml` — has real behavioral divergence (auto-merge policy + Scorecard `TokenPermissionsID` security fix) requiring explicit Level-1 buddy review per the Second-Agent Design Review Gate (Amara 2026-04-29 packet 10) before classification. | |
| **Remaining unclassified after Batch 3a (38 lines / 1 file)**: `.github/workflows/budget-snapshot-cadence.yml` — has real behavioral divergence (auto-merge policy + Scorecard `TokenPermissionsID` security fix) requiring explicit Level-1 buddy review per the Second-Agent Design Review Gate (the Level-1 buddy review packet dated 2026-04-29, packet 10) before classification. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -140,16 +140,16 @@ Current ledger (last updated 2026-04-29T12:31Z, post-option-(c)-migration-PR — | |||||
|
|
||||||
| ```text | ||||||
| potential_loss_lines = 273 all AceHack-only +lines (would be erased on hard-reset) | ||||||
| classified_safe_lines = 227 semantic evidence in BUCKET 2 (SAFE_TO_RESET_LFG_SUPERSEDES) | ||||||
| classified_safe_lines = 235 semantic evidence in BUCKET 2 (SAFE_TO_RESET_LFG_SUPERSEDES) | ||||||
| unsafe_lines = 0 no NEEDS_FORWARD_SYNC or NEEDS_HUMAN_DECISION | ||||||
| unclassified_lines = 46 HEURISTIC_LFG_DOMINATES — pending per-file semantic inspection | ||||||
| unclassified_lines = 38 HEURISTIC_LFG_DOMINATES — pending per-file semantic inspection | ||||||
| ``` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Ledger state**: in-force as of post-#839-merge (option-(c) migration landed 2026-04-29T12:46:29Z). The 9 ACEHACK_ONLY tick rows are durably preserved as Option B shards under `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/28/` on LFG main. Hard-reset of `loop-tick-history.md` is content-preservation-safe. | ||||||
|
||||||
| **Ledger state**: in-force as of post-#839-merge (option-(c) migration landed 2026-04-29T12:46:29Z). The 9 ACEHACK_ONLY tick rows are durably preserved as Option B shards under `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/28/` on LFG main. Hard-reset of `loop-tick-history.md` is content-preservation-safe. | |
| **Ledger state**: in-force as of post-#840-merge (option-(c) migration landed 2026-04-29T12:46:29Z). The 9 ACEHACK_ONLY tick rows are durably preserved as Option B shards under `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/28/` on LFG main. Hard-reset of `loop-tick-history.md` is content-preservation-safe. |
Copilot
AI
Apr 29, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR description says no contingent prose is introduced, but this new sentence includes a contingent/plan-based statement ("After Batch 3b..."). Consider rewriting it as a non-contingent definition of the gate condition (e.g., phrasing in terms of what is true when unclassified_lines reaches 0) rather than tying it to a future batch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"...flipped ... in the follow-up ledger-flip PR" will be unclear once merged (it won’t be obvious which PR is being referenced). Prefer referencing the specific PR number/link, or rephrase to "flipped in this PR" so the statement stays unambiguous over time.