absorb: multi-AI feedback (Deepseek + Amara) + 4 P3 backlog rows + tick 0558Z

docs/backlog/P3/B-0098-tick-ordinal-continuity-lint-2026-04-29.md

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+---
+id: B-0098
+priority: P3
+status: open
+title: Tick-ordinal-continuity lint — ordinals are computed, not narrated
+tier: research-grade
+effort: S
+ask: Multi-AI synthesis packet 2026-04-29 (Deepseek + Amara filter)
+created: 2026-04-29
+last_updated: 2026-04-29
+composes_with: [B-0099, B-0100, B-0101]
+tags: [ci-lint, tick-history, derived-metadata, manual-drift-class, mechanical-guard]
+---
+
+# Tick-ordinal-continuity lint
+
+Hand-authored tick-ordinal words ("twenty-second", "twenty-third",
+etc.) in `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/YYYY/MM/DD/*.md` shards drift
+under edit pressure. The 2026-04-29 ordinal-cascade incident showed
+the failure mode: a Copilot review thread cited a snippet, my "fix"
+trusted the cited context without re-reading the full file
+sequence, and introduced a duplicate ordinal. Recovery worked
+(read all shards → revert → re-verify), but the underlying class
+is *manual metadata drift* — the same class as the bare-`main`
+ambiguity rule.
+
+## Two viable resolutions (pick one or compose)
+
+### Option A — Lint that verifies claimed ordinals against file order
+
+```bash
+# Pseudocode
+for file in $(ls -1 docs/hygiene-history/ticks/YYYY/MM/DD/*.md | sort); do
+  claimed_ordinal=$(grep -oE '\b(first|second|...|thirtieth|...)\b' "$file" | head -1)
+  expected_ordinal=$(compute_from_file_position)
+  [[ "$claimed_ordinal" == "$expected_ordinal" ]] || warn "$file ordinal mismatch"
+done
+```
+
+Pros: keeps the prose readable.
+Cons: still depends on prose, just with a guard.
+
+### Option B — Drop ordinal words from shards entirely; compute in projection
+
+Shards become pure event data (timestamp, model, cron-id, body,
+PR refs, observation). The "twenty-second tick" framing lives only
+in a generated read-model (`docs/hygiene-history/projection/...`)
+that derives the ordinal from file position.
+
+Pros: eliminates the failure class entirely. Aligns with the DBSP/
+Z-set pattern Amara cited (event = stored, projection = derived).
+Cons: requires updating the existing shard schema + tooling.
+
+## Recommendation
+
+Lean toward Option B (the cleaner fix) when next active work
+window opens. Option A as an intermediate guard if prose has to
+stay for a few more rounds.
+
+## Composes with
+
+- `memory/feedback_bare_main_ambiguity_automation_discipline_explicit_refs_required_amara_2026_04_29.md`
+  — same class (computed > narrated metadata).
+- B-0099 (PR-count projection) — sibling action item from the same
+  packet.
+
+## Why P3 (research-grade, not blocking)
+
+The ordinal drift was caught and corrected within 2-3 ticks via the
+existing review pipeline. The mechanical guard would prevent
+future occurrences but is not blocking; opening it as P0/P1 would
+violate the maintainer's narrowing on multi-AI-synthesis-packet
+items. Promote when work-bandwidth allows.

docs/backlog/P3/B-0099-pr-count-projection-not-narrated-2026-04-29.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+---
+id: B-0099
+priority: P3
+status: open
+title: PR-count claims are derived metrics — compute, don't narrate
+tier: research-grade
+effort: S
+ask: Multi-AI synthesis packet 2026-04-29 (Deepseek + Amara filter)
+created: 2026-04-29
+last_updated: 2026-04-29
+composes_with: [B-0098, B-0100, B-0101]
+tags: [tick-history, derived-metadata, manual-drift-class, mechanical-guard, projection]
+---
+
+# PR-count claims are computed, not remembered
+
+Hand-authored "session PR totals" in tick-history shards (e.g.
+"30 PRs total this session arc") drift across shards. The
+2026-04-29 session arc had to soften several claims to "approximate"
+because the asserted totals diverged from the actual git log.
+Same failure class as the tick-ordinal drift (B-0098): derived
+metadata authored as prose.
+
+## Resolution
+
+When a tick shard needs to cite a session PR total:
+
+1. **Don't write it as authoritative prose.** No "this is the
+   thirty-first PR of the arc" style claims unless computed.
+
+2. **If included, cite the computation.** E.g.,
+   `count via gh pr list --search 'merged:>=2026-04-29 author:@me' | wc -l`.
+
+3. **Better: move totals to a generated projection.** A small
+   script that walks `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/YYYY/MM/DD/*.md`
+   + `gh` API + `git log` and produces a session-summary file
+   eliminates the manual drift class entirely.
+
+## Composes with
+
+- B-0098 (tick-ordinal-continuity lint) — sibling derived-metadata
+  action item.
+- `memory/feedback_bare_main_ambiguity_automation_discipline_explicit_refs_required_amara_2026_04_29.md`
+  — same computed-vs-narrated discipline.
+
+## Why P3
+
+Same reasoning as B-0098 — the drift was caught and the prose
+softened. Mechanical fix is bounded but research-grade-only per
+the maintainer's narrowing.

docs/backlog/P3/B-0100-pure-wait-tick-backpressure-quiescence-rule-2026-04-29.md

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+---
+id: B-0100
+priority: P3
+status: open
+title: Pure-wait tick backpressure / quiescence rule for autonomous-loop tick shards
+tier: research-grade
+effort: M
+ask: Multi-AI synthesis packet 2026-04-29 (Deepseek + Amara filter)
+created: 2026-04-29
+last_updated: 2026-04-29
+composes_with: [B-0098, B-0099, B-0101]
+tags: [autonomous-loop, tick-history, backpressure, quiescence, repo-hygiene, soulfile]
+---
+
+# Pure-wait tick backpressure / quiescence rule
+
+Right now every `<<autonomous-loop>>` cron fire produces a
+tick-history shard PR, even if the only tick activity was "queue
+checked, nothing to merge, CI in progress, no events." Over a
+long-enough operational drain the repo accumulates thousands of
+near-identical "pure-wait" shards.
+
+The packet's strategic point: there's currently no termination
+condition.
+
+## Two-tier proposal
+
+### Tier 1 — Backpressure (immediate)
+
+```text
+If open tick-history PRs >= 3
+and the tick has no substantive event
+and only CI is pending,
+do not open another pure-wait shard.
+Batch or skip until one lands.
+```
+
+Implementable as a check in the tick-close procedure: count open
+`tick-history/*` PRs; if ≥ N and the tick body would be a
+pure-wait note, skip the shard creation step.
+
+### Tier 2 — Quiescence (after Tier 1 lands)
+
+```text
+After M consecutive no-op / CI-wait ticks,
+enter quiescent mode:
+- stop per-minute shards
+- run periodic health checks (e.g., hourly)
+- wake on external signal:
+    - new PR opened
+    - failing build
+    - maintainer input
+    - unresolved review thread
+```
+
+Implementable as a CronCreate cadence change on detection of
+quiescence + a re-arm trigger.
+
+## Why this matters
+
+Per the soulfile-cleanliness rule
+(`memory/feedback_repo_is_soulfile_dont_commit_raw_diagnostic_dumps_aaron_amara_2026_04_29.md`),
+text compresses well in pack-delta storage so individual
+near-identical shards aren't a soulfile risk. But:
+
+- Repo browse-ability suffers (thousands of shards = hard to
+  scan).
+- PR-review backlog accumulates (each shard needs a CI cycle).
+- The factory's signal-to-noise ratio degrades — "what changed
+  this hour" becomes "scroll through 60 shards."
+
+## Why P3
+
+The loop is currently in productive operational drain — every
+recent tick has had real events (PR merges, review-thread fixes,
+mid-tick corrections). The quiescence rule fires only when drain
+runs out. Backpressure is a slightly more proactive safeguard
+but still bounded. Promote when active drain is clear.
+
+## Composes with
+
+- B-0098, B-0099, B-0101 — sibling actionables from the same
+  packet.
+- `docs/AUTONOMOUS-LOOP.md` — current per-minute cron contract.
+- `memory/feedback_never_idle_speculative_work_over_waiting.md`
+  — the never-idle invariant; quiescence is its dual (idle is OK
+  when queue is genuinely empty, but only after sustained
+  evidence).

docs/backlog/P3/B-0101-reviewer-artifact-classification-small-table-2026-04-29.md

@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+---
+id: B-0101
+priority: P3
+status: open
+title: Reviewer-artifact classification — small 5-bucket table (Copilot + future review agents)
+tier: research-grade
+effort: S
+ask: Multi-AI synthesis packet 2026-04-29 (Deepseek + Amara filter)
+created: 2026-04-29
+last_updated: 2026-04-29
+composes_with: [B-0098, B-0099, B-0100]
+tags: [code-review, copilot, reviewer-noise, taxonomy, classification]
+---
+
+# Reviewer-artifact classification — small 5-bucket table
+
+The autonomous-loop is now effectively a two-agent loop: the
+acting agent (Otto / Claude) + the reviewing agent (Copilot
+pull-request-reviewer, plus increasingly cross-AI peers). The
+review agent has its own failure modes that the acting agent
+needs to distinguish from real findings.
+
+Recent recurring reviewer-failure patterns from this session:
+
+- `display-artifact` — Copilot hallucinated "leading space and
+  `1 ||`" prefix that wasn't in the actual file.
+- `time-travel-review-artifact` — reviewer evaluated a PR snapshot
+  before cited dependency PRs merged; the reference was valid on
+  current main.
+- `incomplete-cited-context` — the reviewer's snippet was correct
+  but not load-bearing for the issue; trusting it without
+  re-reading the full file caused an over-correction
+  (the 2026-04-29 ordinal-drift cascade).
+
+## Proposed small classification table (5 buckets, intentionally small per Amara's filter)
+
+```text
+REAL_DEFECT
+  - actual code/doc/test issue caught by reviewer
+  - action: fix in current PR
+
+REVIEWER_SNAPSHOT_LAG
+  - reviewer evaluated a stale snapshot of repo state
+  - cited reference is now valid on current main
+  - action: comment with merged SHAs, resolve thread
+
+DISPLAY_ARTIFACT
+  - reviewer's quoted excerpt contains characters not in source
+  - benign hallucination from review-tool rendering
+  - action: resolve with brief explanatory comment
+
+INCOMPLETE_CONTEXT
+  - reviewer's cited snippet is correct but not load-bearing
+  - fix should re-read full file before applying
+  - action: read full source, decide if fix is real or no-op
+
+NEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW
+  - reviewer flagged something the acting agent can't classify
+  - action: leave thread open, surface to maintainer
+```
+
+## Where this lands
+
+Two options:
+
+1. **As a memory file** — `memory/feedback_reviewer_artifact_classification_5_buckets_2026_04_29.md` —
+   gives future-Claude a quick decision tree.
+
+2. **As a section in a code-review skill** — embed in
+   `.claude/skills/code-reviewer/` or similar, so the
+   classification is invoked at decision time, not lookup
+   time.
+
+Decision deferred to whoever picks up the action item.
+
+## Why P3
+
+The classification works informally now — most reviewer findings
+get correctly classified by acting-agent judgment. Codifying it
+hardens the discipline but isn't blocking. Promote when active
+drain is clear.
+
+## Composes with
+
+- B-0098, B-0099, B-0100 — sibling actionables from the same
+  packet.
+- `memory/feedback_otto_355_blocked_with_green_ci_means_investigate_review_threads_first_dont_wait_2026_04_27.md`
+  — the BLOCKED-with-green-CI rule that makes review-thread
+  triage a load-bearing tick step.
+- `memory/feedback_outdated_review_threads_block_merge_resolve_explicitly_after_force_push_2026_04_27.md`
+  — outdated-thread resolution discipline; partially overlaps
+  with REVIEWER_SNAPSHOT_LAG.

docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0558Z.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+| 2026-04-29T05:58:17Z | claude-opus-4-7 | 26f978a2 | substrate-rich tick — 4 work-streams. (1) PR #804 (durable-retry fix) absorbed Copilot review: 4 P1/P2 findings addressed (named-attribution rewrite in linux.sh + elan.sh; --retry-all-errors qualifier added; hardcoded line-numbers replaced with stable anchors in memory file); 4 threads resolved. (2) PR #805 (tick-0550Z shard) absorbed 1 Copilot finding (memory/ prefix + explicit backlog row paths); 1 thread resolved. (3) Mid-tick packet from maintainer: forwarded Deepseek reassessment + Amara filter-to-actionables. Verbatim absorb landed at `docs/research/multi-ai-feedback-2026-04-29-deepseek-amara-on-loop-state.md` (research-grade, §33 archive header). (4) Filed 4 small backlog rows (B-0098..B-0101) for Amara-filtered actionables: tick-ordinal-continuity-lint, PR-count-projection, pure-wait-tick-backpressure-rule, reviewer-artifact-classification-table. The 5th actionable (external-dep retry/cache) is already addressed by PR #804. Evidence-claim language tightening per the 6th actionable: "strong behavioral evidence of scaffolded self-correction" replaces any "proof of general reliability" framing in future shards. | [#804 Copilot fixes pushed](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/804), [#805 Copilot fix pushed](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/805), this PR (absorb + 4 backlog rows + this shard) | Pattern observation: tick velocity changed from "drain 1 PR/tick" to "drain + absorb mid-tick packet + file bounded action items" without conflict — the packet was integrated alongside the existing review-thread work, not instead of it. The chunking pattern Aaron explicitly liked ("i like your chunking") composes here: ONE PR for the absorb-bundle (research note + 4 backlog rows + tick shard) rather than 6 separate PRs. The maintainer's existing narrowing on multi-AI synthesis ("Do not let Claude/Otto open a bunch of new PRs for all these insights") is honored: action items are P3 backlog rows not active work. Evidence-claim discipline now in force per Amara's filter — "scaffolded self-correction" is the right shape. The factory absorbed real external feedback within 8 minutes of arrival. |