tick-history: 2026-04-29T05:32Z — twenty-sixth tick (PR #791 ordinal fix + PR #792 display-artifact)

docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0532Z.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+| 2026-04-29T05:32:06Z | claude-opus-4-7 | 26f978a2 | twenty-sixth tick — two thread fixes. PR #791 P0: tick ordinal off-by-one — claimed "twenty-second tick" but the prior shards established "nineteenth" (0521Z) and "twentieth" (0522Z), so 0526Z should be "twenty-first". Fixed. PR #792 same display-artifact thread (`1 \|\|` prefix hallucination); resolved as not-actionable per the established precedent (PR #760 / #777 / #781 all resolved similarly). The recurring-fix-class catalog continues to bound work — both thread classes are well-known patterns now. | [#791](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/791) [#792](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/792) [#793](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/793) [#794](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/794) | Trajectory observation: tick-ordinal off-by-one is a new finding-class (tick-history-ordinal-numeric-drift) entered this tick. Each tick-history shard claims its position in the day's tick sequence; if my counts drift, the chronological substrate becomes unreliable. The fix class: read prior shards' claimed ordinals and verify continuity before claiming the next. Mechanical guard: a tick-ordinal-continuity lint that compares each shard's claimed ordinal against the count of prior shard files in the same day. Backlog candidate (synthesis packet expansion item) — NOT opening this tick per Amara's narrowing. |