Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0511Z.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
| 2026-04-29T05:11:35Z | claude-opus-4-7 | 26f978a2 | fourteenth tick — narrow drain. Two thread fixes: (a) PR #775 Codex P2 — the "with a local main tracking origin" example used `git switch main` (bare), which only works AFTER `refs/heads/main` already exists locally; on first-run scripts where the local branch hasn't been created yet, bare `main` would still hit the multi-remote ambiguity fatal. Fixed by replacing bare `git switch main` with explicit `git switch refs/heads/main` (unambiguous regardless of local state — asks Git for the local-branch ref directly, never the remote-tracking namespace). Also replaced `git branch --track ... 2>/dev/null \|\| true` with `git branch -f main refs/remotes/origin/main` for unconditional idempotent local ref creation at the explicit start-point. (b) PR #781 same display-artifact-thread class as PR #760 + #777 (Copilot reads "leading space and `1 \|\|` prefix" from a renderer view-mode confusion, not file content); resolved as not-actionable with explanatory comment. | [#775](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/775) [#781](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/781) | Trajectory observation: the bare-main rule has now had THREE rounds of refinement (Amara round-1 + Amara round-2 + Codex round-3 catching the bare-`switch main` slip). Each round caught a real edge case: round-1 = ambiguity + hard-stop; round-2 = orchestrator-vs-shell semantics + concurrency + future-consolidation; round-3 = first-run-no-local-branch edge case. The rule now covers a much larger set of scenarios than the original draft. The seven-step meta-loop fired three times on this single rule, and each iteration tightened the discipline. This is the convergence pattern Amara predicted — multi-AI review catching the things one author misses, even when the author is being careful. |
Loading