Skip to content

hygiene(tick-history): shard 0450Z#753

Merged
AceHack merged 2 commits intomainfrom
tick-history/2026-04-29-tick-0450Z-shard
Apr 30, 2026
Merged

hygiene(tick-history): shard 0450Z#753
AceHack merged 2 commits intomainfrom
tick-history/2026-04-29-tick-0450Z-shard

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented Apr 29, 2026

Minimal.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 29, 2026 02:37
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) April 29, 2026 02:37
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new autonomous-loop tick-history shard for 2026-04-29 0450Z under the per-tick shard directory.

Changes:

  • Introduces a new tick-history shard file for the 0450Z tick.
  • Records model/session, cron sentinel, action summary, PR ref, and observation in a single-row Markdown entry.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0450Z.md:2

  • docs/hygiene-history/ticks/README.md defines shard files as a single-row Markdown file. This file currently has an extra blank line after the row; please remove trailing empty lines so the shard is exactly one row.
| 2026-04-29T04:50:00Z (autonomous-loop tick — minimal) | opus-4-7 / session continuation | 26f978a2 | Pure-maintenance tick. Cron armed. | (PR #753) | (minimal) |

Comment thread docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0450Z.md Outdated
…pilot review)

Per docs/hygiene-history/ticks/README.md schema, the first column
must be a plain ISO-8601 UTC timestamp. The parenthetical note
that previously appeared after the timestamp is preserved
implicitly via the body cell.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AceHack AceHack merged commit 884ccd0 into main Apr 30, 2026
20 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the tick-history/2026-04-29-tick-0450Z-shard branch April 30, 2026 23:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants