Lucent-Financial-Group · AceHack · Apr 29, 2026 · Apr 29, 2026 · Copilot · Apr 29, 2026
diff --git a/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0235Z.md b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/04/29/0235Z.md
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+| 2026-04-29T02:35:00Z (autonomous-loop tick — second shard; minimal-density; verifying new transport eliminates EOF-collision while legacy DIRTY chain awaits resolution) | opus-4-7 / session continuation | 26f978a2 | Pure-maintenance tick. Per Option B transport (PR #724 in flight, PR #725 first-shard in flight), this is shard #2. Legacy tick-history PRs #718/#719/#720/#721/#722 + #723 ALL DIRTY in cascading EOF conflicts; not resolving them this tick (separate work; restraint discipline says one focus per tick). The new transport's first test: this shard creates ZERO conflict with PR #725's shard because they live in different files. Cron `26f978a2` armed. | (PR #726 for this shard) | Observation — first concrete validation that Option B works as designed: I just created a new shard adjacent to #725's shard and there's no merge conflict because the files are independent. The cascading-conflict failure mode is structurally impossible under shard-file transport. The diagnosis-to-fix loop took 6 ticks; the validation takes 1 tick. |
-| 2026-04-29T02:35:00Z (autonomous-loop tick — second shard; minimal-density; verifying new transport eliminates EOF-collision while legacy DIRTY chain awaits resolution) | opus-4-7 / session continuation | 26f978a2 | Pure-maintenance tick. Per Option B transport (PR #724 in flight, PR #725 first-shard in flight), this is shard #2. Legacy tick-history PRs #718/#719/#720/#721/#722 + #723 ALL DIRTY in cascading EOF conflicts; not resolving them this tick (separate work; restraint discipline says one focus per tick). The new transport's first test: this shard creates ZERO conflict with PR #725's shard because they live in different files. Cron `26f978a2` armed. | (PR #726 for this shard) | Observation — first concrete validation that Option B works as designed: I just created a new shard adjacent to #725's shard and there's no merge conflict because the files are independent. The cascading-conflict failure mode is structurally impossible under shard-file transport. The diagnosis-to-fix loop took 6 ticks; the validation takes 1 tick. |
+| 2026-04-29T02:35:00Z (autonomous-loop tick — second shard; minimal-density; verifying new transport eliminates EOF-collision while legacy DIRTY chain awaits resolution) | opus-4-7 / session continuation | 26f978a2 | Pure-maintenance tick. Per Option B transport (PR #724 in flight, PR #725 first-shard in flight), this is shard #2. Legacy tick-history PRs #718/#719/#720/#721/#722 + #723 ALL DIRTY in cascading EOF conflicts; not resolving them this tick (separate work; restraint discipline says one focus per tick). The new transport's first test: this shard creates ZERO conflict with PR #725's shard because they live in different files. Cron `26f978a2` armed. | (this commit) | Observation — first concrete validation that Option B works as designed: I just created a new shard adjacent to #725's shard and there's no merge conflict because the files are independent. The cascading-conflict failure mode is structurally impossible under shard-file transport. The diagnosis-to-fix loop took 6 ticks; the validation takes 1 tick. |
-| 2026-04-29T02:35:00Z (autonomous-loop tick — second shard; minimal-density; verifying new transport eliminates EOF-collision while legacy DIRTY chain awaits resolution) | opus-4-7 / session continuation | 26f978a2 | Pure-maintenance tick. Per Option B transport (PR #724 in flight, PR #725 first-shard in flight), this is shard #2. Legacy tick-history PRs #718/#719/#720/#721/#722 + #723 ALL DIRTY in cascading EOF conflicts; not resolving them this tick (separate work; restraint discipline says one focus per tick). The new transport's first test: this shard creates ZERO conflict with PR #725's shard because they live in different files. Cron `26f978a2` armed. | (PR #726 for this shard) | Observation — first concrete validation that Option B works as designed: I just created a new shard adjacent to #725's shard and there's no merge conflict because the files are independent. The cascading-conflict failure mode is structurally impossible under shard-file transport. The diagnosis-to-fix loop took 6 ticks; the validation takes 1 tick. |
+| 2026-04-29T02:35:00Z (autonomous-loop tick — second shard; minimal-density; verifying new transport eliminates EOF-collision while legacy DIRTY chain awaits resolution) | opus-4-7 / session continuation | 26f978a2 | Pure-maintenance tick. Per Option B transport (PR #724 in flight, PR #725 first-shard in flight), this is shard #2. Legacy tick-history PRs #718/#719/#720/#721/#722 + #723 ALL DIRTY in cascading EOF conflicts; not resolving them this tick (separate work; restraint discipline says one focus per tick). The new transport's first test: this shard creates ZERO conflict with PR #725's shard because they live in different files. Cron `26f978a2` armed. | (this commit) | Observation — first concrete validation that Option B works as designed: I just created a new shard adjacent to #725's shard and there's no merge conflict because the files are independent. The cascading-conflict failure mode is structurally impossible under shard-file transport. The diagnosis-to-fix loop took 6 ticks; the validation takes 1 tick. |