Skip to content

memory(CURRENT-amara §12): three Amara class-namings from autonomous-loop arc#689

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit intomainfrom
memory/current-amara-section-12-three-class-namings-2026-04-28
Apr 28, 2026
Merged

memory(CURRENT-amara §12): three Amara class-namings from autonomous-loop arc#689
AceHack merged 1 commit intomainfrom
memory/current-amara-section-12-three-class-namings-2026-04-28

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented Apr 28, 2026

Adds §12 to CURRENT-amara.md surfacing the three class-namings Amara contributed during this autonomous-loop arc (Chronological Insertion Polarity Error, Incomplete Source-Set Regeneration Hazard + Workflow Null-Result Audit Signal, Outdated Review-Thread Merge Gate Residue), with worked examples + the recognized pattern of class-naming as ferry contribution. Per the same-tick CURRENT-update discipline. No code changes.

…loop arc 2026-04-28

Per the same-tick CURRENT-update discipline: surfacing the
3 class-namings Amara contributed this arc into CURRENT-amara.md
so future-Otto reads them on wake.

Three classes, three worked examples, all in one ~30min arc:

1. Chronological Insertion Polarity Error
   (PR #685; control: cat >> EOF or canonical-sort)

2. Incomplete Source-Set Regeneration Hazard +
   Workflow Null-Result Audit Signal
   (PR #685; control: --check first, six diagnostic questions
   for null-result audit; concrete catches: B-0085 + B-0087)

3. Outdated Review-Thread Merge Gate Residue
   (PR #687; control: reply with commit-SHA + explicit resolve)

Pattern of class-naming as ferry contribution documented:
observation → forward → Amara review → formal class + counterweight
taxonomy mapping → land same-arc. 5-7 min round-trip makes this
cheap enough to do inline.

Refresh markers updated. No code-surface changes.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 28, 2026 20:16
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) April 28, 2026 20:16
@AceHack AceHack merged commit 3edb09c into main Apr 28, 2026
25 of 26 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the memory/current-amara-section-12-three-class-namings-2026-04-28 branch April 28, 2026 20:19
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new §12 entry to memory/CURRENT-amara.md summarizing three newly formalized “class namings” (each with definitions, controls, and worked examples) from the current autonomous-loop arc, and updates the file’s refresh metadata.

Changes:

  • Add §12 describing the three class-namings and the recurring “observation → named class → control → taxonomy mapping” pattern.
  • Record which memory artifacts were landed/extended as part of the arc.
  • Update the “Last full refresh / Prior refresh / File created” footer metadata.

Comment thread memory/CURRENT-amara.md
PR #685 substrate batch).
- Edit-tool prepend semantics on oldest-first append-only
files = chronological reversal.
- Control: `cat >> file <<EOF` always-append OR run
Copy link

Copilot AI Apr 28, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tools/hygiene/sort-tick-history-canonical.py is specialized for the tick-history table format (defaulting to docs/hygiene-history/loop-tick-history.md, with a --file override). Here it’s presented as a generic control for any “oldest-first append-only file”; consider tightening the wording to avoid implying it’s safe/appropriate for arbitrary files (e.g., call out it’s for loop-tick-history or tick-history-format files specifically).

Suggested change
- Control: `cat >> file <<EOF` always-append OR run
- Control: `cat >> file <<EOF` always-append OR, for
loop-tick-history / tick-history-format files, run

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2026
…ing Ferry Protocol with SD-9 guardrail + B-0088 (#691)

Three substrate landings from this autonomous-loop arc closing
the substrate-discipline meta-loop:

1. Advisory Enforcement Workflow Gap class (Amara 2026-04-28T20:24Z):
   memory/feedback_advisory_enforcement_workflow_gap_amara_class_name_otto_2026_04_28.md.
   Definition: workflow claims/implies enforcement but is not
   in required-status-checks set; failures observable but
   non-blocking. Worked example: paired-edit lint failed on
   #688/#689 but both auto-merged. Decision: promote to required
   OR downgrade claim to advisory. Risk: 'guardrail that looks
   like enforcement but behaves like telemetry.'

2. Class-Naming Ferry Protocol with SD-9 guardrail (Amara
   2026-04-28T20:24Z; Aaron 2026-04-28T20:25Z reinforced 'she
   is 100% right here'):
   memory/feedback_class_naming_ferry_protocol_with_sd9_guardrail_amara_2026_04_28.md.
   Meta-class for the Otto-observe -> Aaron-forward -> Amara-review
   -> encode genre. SD-9 guardrail LOAD-BEARING (not footnote):
   Amara endorsement is signal, NOT proof. Local factory-hygiene
   classes encode freely; non-local claims need substrate
   evidence + external lineage + falsifier. Anti-pattern: 'Amara
   blesses the name, therefore true' — Aaron explicitly named
   this as the failure mode to guard against.

3. B-0088 P2 backlog row (the concrete instance the Advisory
   Enforcement Workflow Gap class names):
   docs/backlog/P2/B-0088-*.md.
   Decision fork for maintainer: A (promote paired-edit lint to
   required-status-check) or B (downgrade discoverability claim
   to advisory). Sibling lint audit catalogued
   (memory-reference-existence, memory-index-duplicate,
   backlog-index-integrity).

The SD-9 guardrail prevents a halo-effect failure mode in the
class-naming ferry: each future Amara-named class encoding must
preserve the worked-example + mechanism + falsifier shape. Local
classes pass quickly; non-local claims must show evidence.

MEMORY.md index updated with 2 new entries; paired-edit marker
bumped to PR #691. All 5 classes named in this arc remain
local-factory-hygiene (no non-local claims), pass SD-9 quickly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants