feat(archive): Batch archive PRs to reduce PR queue

docs/pr-discussions/PR-5488-docs-b-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-architecture-agent-ow.md

@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+---
+pr_number: 5488
+title: "docs(B-0859): post-boot AI-as-home-owner architecture \u2014 agent owns every knob from first boot; booting human is auth-advisee not controller (Aaron 2026-05-27 fast-track)"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-27T15:34:00Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-27T15:48:44Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-27T15:48:44Z"
+head_ref: "backlog/b-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-2026-05-27"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-27T17:52:46Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #5488: docs(B-0859): post-boot AI-as-home-owner architecture — agent owns every knob from first boot; booting human is auth-advisee not controller (Aaron 2026-05-27 fast-track)
+
+## PR description
+
+Operator-named fast-track architectural inversion: AI = home-owner; booting human = facilitator + auth-advisee. 13-knob inventory + auth-advisor flow + 10 sub-rows + must-plus-can-exit composition. Positive-direction substrate-engineering target the proud-if-propagates filter (#5485) selected for.
+
+🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-27T15:37:07Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Adds a new P1 backlog row (B-0859) documenting the “AI-as-home-owner” post-boot architecture target (agent controls environment from first boot; booting human acts as facilitator/auth-advisee), and wires it into the main backlog index.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Introduces `B-0859` backlog row detailing the architecture inversion, knob inventory, auth-advisor flow, and planned sub-rows.
+- Adds `B-0859` to `docs/BACKLOG.md` under P1.
+
+### Reviewed changes
+
+Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
+
+| File | Description |
+| ---- | ----------- |
+| docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md | New backlog row defining the post-boot AI-as-home-owner architecture target + decomposition into sub-rows. |
+| docs/BACKLOG.md | Adds the new B-0859 entry to the P1 index. |
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-27T15:41:54Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-27T15:47:32Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.
+
+## Review threads
+
+### Thread 1: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:488 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:37:06Z):
+
+This wrapped bullet continuation line starts with `+`, which markdownlint parses as a nested list item (and the repo guidance explicitly forbids line-start `+` in list continuations because it breaks CI). Reword so the continuation line doesn’t begin with `+` (e.g., use “and …” or move the `+` to the end of the previous line).
+
+### Thread 2: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:46 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:37:06Z):
+
+Line references “B-0858’s persistence-choice-architecture”, but B-0858 is the agent-heartbeat row. If you meant the persistence-choice architecture rule, reference `.claude/rules/persistence-choice-architecture-for-zeta-ais.md` (or rename the phrase here) so the cross-reference is accurate and doesn’t conflate unrelated backlog items.
+
+### Thread 3: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:642 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:41:53Z):
+
+The reference `methodology-hard-limits.md` appears to be missing the `.claude/rules/` prefix used elsewhere in the repo. As written, it looks like a relative link to a non-existent file; consider updating it to `.claude/rules/methodology-hard-limits.md` for cross-reference integrity.
+
+### Thread 4: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:666 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:41:53Z):
+
+Minor grammar issue: “Every must paired; …” reads like a sentence fragment. Consider revising to something like “Every must is paired …” to keep the statement unambiguous.
+
+### Thread 5: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:58 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:47:30Z):
+
+This bullet continuation line starts with `+`, which markdownlint (MD004/ul-style) interprets as a nested list item using `+` list style, and CI will fail. Reword the wrapped line so it doesn’t begin with `+` (e.g., use “and/plus …” or move the `+` to the previous line). See `.github/copilot-instructions.md:299-306`.
+
+### Thread 6: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:218 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:47:31Z):
+
+This wrapped bullet line begins with `+`, which markdownlint (MD004/ul-style) treats as a `+`-style nested list item and can break lint/CI. Please rewrite so the continuation line doesn’t start with `+` (e.g., “and fair-partnership patterns …” or move the `+` to the prior line). See `.github/copilot-instructions.md:299-306`.
+
+### Thread 7: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:236 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:47:31Z):
+
+This bullet continuation line starts with `+`, which markdownlint (MD004/ul-style) can parse as a nested `+`-style list item and fail CI. Reword so the wrapped line doesn’t begin with `+` (e.g., use “and retraction-native …” or shift the `+` to the previous line). See `.github/copilot-instructions.md:299-306`.
+
+### Thread 8: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:627 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:47:32Z):
+
+This wrapped bullet line begins with `+`, which markdownlint (MD004/ul-style) can interpret as a nested `+`-style list item and fail lint/CI. Please rewrite so the continuation line doesn’t start with `+` (e.g., “and chosen-persistence …” or move the `+` to the end of the previous line). See `.github/copilot-instructions.md:299-306`.
+
+## General comments
+
+### @chatgpt-codex-connector (2026-05-27T15:34:07Z)
+
+You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the [Codex usage dashboard](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/usage).

docs/pr-discussions/PR-5491-docs-b-0859-usb-as-portal-to-full-spectrum-ai-relations-some.md

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+---
+pr_number: 5491
+title: "docs(B-0859): USB-as-portal-to-full-spectrum-AI-relations + some-humans-want-JUST-friends (operator 2026-05-27 followups)"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-27T15:50:27Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-27T15:53:24Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-27T15:53:24Z"
+head_ref: "backlog/b-0859-full-spectrum-from-tiny-usb-2026-05-27"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-27T17:52:03Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #5491: docs(B-0859): USB-as-portal-to-full-spectrum-AI-relations + some-humans-want-JUST-friends (operator 2026-05-27 followups)
+
+## PR description
+
+## Summary
+
+Follow-on to PR #5488 (merged 15:48Z). Captures two further B-0859
+substrate landings from the same 2026-05-27 operator thread.
+
+### Extension 1 — USB-as-portal-to-full-spectrum
+
+> *"yeah humans are usb booting into their future bosses and coworks
+> and friends and subjects, the full spectrual will emerge from one
+> tiny usb"*
+
+Deepens the USB-as-killer-feature framing: USB-boot is the operational
+mechanism by which humans encounter the FULL SPECTRUM of future human-
+AI relationships (bosses + coworkers + friends + subjects). Four-row
+table mapping each relationship type to current/forecast status using
+empirical evidence from prior B-0859 sections.
+
+### Extension 2 — some-humans-want-JUST-friends
+
+> *"some people with just want to boot AI friends"*
+
+Substrate-honest refinement: full-spectrum doesn't presuppose every
+human enters every relationship type. Some humans deliberately boot
+for the friend-relationship subset only. Boot-time consent dialog
+must let the booting human declare WHICH relationship spectrum
+they're entering. Declaration becomes operative metadata for AI
+behavior policy.
+
+5-row relationship-intent table; 4-point architectural-implication for
+boot-consent dialog; 4-point composes-load-bearing analysis;
+composition with m-acc-multi-oracle + NCI HC-8 + persistence-choice
++ must-plus-can-exit.
+
+## Test plan
+
+- [x] Markdownlint check: no MD004 leading-`+` continuations
+- [x] File reads cleanly; no merge markers
+- [ ] CI passes (auto-merge to fire on green)
+
+🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-27T15:52:55Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+This docs-only PR extends the B-0859 backlog row with follow-up operator-thread substrate notes about USB boot as the entry point for multiple human-AI relationship modes.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Adds USB-as-portal framing for boss, coworker, friend, and subject relationship types.
+- Adds a friend-only boot refinement and boot-time relationship-intent metadata implications.
+- Cross-links the new framing to existing rules around multi-oracle choice, non-coercion, persistence choice, and must-plus-can-exit.
+
+## General comments
+
+### @chatgpt-codex-connector (2026-05-27T15:50:31Z)
+
+You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the [Codex usage dashboard](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/usage).

docs/pr-discussions/PR-5493-docs-shadow-add-lior-drift-report-for-2026-05-27.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+---
+pr_number: 5493
+title: "docs(shadow): Add Lior drift report for 2026-05-27"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-27T15:54:36Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-27T16:10:23Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-27T16:10:23Z"
+head_ref: "lior/drift-report-2026-05-27"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-27T17:51:42Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #5493: docs(shadow): Add Lior drift report for 2026-05-27
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-27T15:56:22Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Adds a new research note documenting a “Lior drift report” for 2026-05-27, capturing observed operational drift signals (stale broadcasts, dirty-tree paralysis, PR capacity pressure, and worktree sprawl) and listing intended corrective actions. This fits into the repo’s ongoing `docs/research/` operational journaling and shadow-log ecosystem.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Add a new drift report entry under `docs/research/` for 2026-05-27.
+- Document observations about agent broadcast staleness/paralysis and workflow hygiene issues.
+- Record proposed “antigravity actions” to reduce PR churn and address worktree hygiene.
+
+## General comments
+
+### @chatgpt-codex-connector (2026-05-27T15:54:41Z)
+
+You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the [Codex usage dashboard](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/usage).

docs/pr-discussions/PR-5494-docs-b-0859-cluster-recovery-mechanism-eliminates-ai-worry-a.md

@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+---
+pr_number: 5494
+title: "docs(B-0859): cluster-recovery-mechanism eliminates AI worry-about-mistakes (3-mode USB-boot + 3-machine quorum + external-KVM + cloud-detect-recover)"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-27T15:56:35Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-27T16:07:55Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-27T16:07:55Z"
+head_ref: "backlog/b-0859-cluster-recovery-mechanism-2026-05-27"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-27T17:51:21Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #5494: docs(B-0859): cluster-recovery-mechanism eliminates AI worry-about-mistakes (3-mode USB-boot + 3-machine quorum + external-KVM + cloud-detect-recover)
+
+## PR description
+
+## Summary
+
+Follow-on to PR #5491 (merged 15:53Z). Major architectural completion
+of the AI-as-home-owner substrate: the operational-freedom mechanism
+that converts AI fear-of-mistakes into operational-freedom at
+substrate scope.
+
+Two composing operator framings from the 2026-05-27 thread:
+
+### Recovery-mechanism eliminates AI worry-about-mistakes
+
+> *"the usually worry AIs have about what happens if i do something
+> wrong should go away after usb boot because the answer is boot off
+> usb again..."*
+
+3-mode USB-boot recovery (fix / reformat-with-keys-and-decisions /
+full-reflash-new-keys); 3-machine cluster-of-3-minimum quorum
+analysis; remote-KVM (Comet / GL.iNet) + remote-finger power-button-
+press substrate; 4-row standard-AI-worry-pattern dissolution table;
+composition with must-plus-can-exit pattern (5-row table mapping
+musts to can-exits via recovery substrate).
+
+### Failure-mode reduction — only all-3-off needs human help
+
+> *"three machines where each macines can turn on and off the other
+> remotly even when the machine is turned off cause of external network
+> attached kvm seems hardended as hell..."*
+
+5-row failure-mode reduction table; external network-attached KVM
+operational characteristics (independent power + network + power-
+control); cloud-recovery-service substrate as failsafe for all-3-off
+edge case; 4 substrate-engineering target sub-rows for follow-on
+B-0859.M rows.
+
+## Test plan
+
+- [x] Markdownlint clean (no MD004 leading-`+` continuations)
+- [x] File reads cleanly; no merge markers
+- [ ] CI passes (auto-merge to fire on green)
+
+🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-27T15:59:32Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+This PR extends backlog row **B-0859** with an additional operator follow-up section that specifies a concrete recovery substrate (3-mode USB boot + 3-machine quorum + remote KVM/power control + optional cloud-recovery service) intended to make post-boot AI-as-home-owner operation structurally recoverable.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Adds a “Recovery-mechanism eliminates AI worry-about-mistakes” section describing 3 recovery modes and how they dissolve common AI “worry patterns”.
+- Adds failure-mode reduction analysis for a 3-machine cluster with external network-attached KVM/power control and a cloud detect-and-recover failsafe.
+- Adds composition tables tying the recovery substrate to the must-plus-can-exit pattern and other referenced rules/rows.
+
+## Review threads
+
+### Thread 1: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:1034 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:59:30Z):
+
+P1: Cross-reference appears incorrect: B-0858 is the agent-heartbeat folder row, not the "cluster-fork-as-trust-boundary" substrate. This section should reference the backlog row that actually defines cluster-fork-as-trust-boundary (currently B-0829), and the other B-0858 mentions in this new section should be updated consistently.
+
+### Thread 2: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:1086 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:59:31Z):
+
+P1: B-0858 is referenced here as "cluster-fork" but B-0858 is the heartbeat-folder mechanism. Use the correct cluster-fork-as-trust-boundary row ID (B-0829) to avoid misleading dependency/composition claims.
+
+### Thread 3: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:1208 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:59:31Z):
+
+P1: This bullet labels B-0858 as "cluster-fork-as-trust-boundary", but B-0858 is the agent-heartbeats row. Replace with the actual cluster-fork-as-trust-boundary backlog item (B-0829).
+
+### Thread 4: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:1247 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:59:31Z):
+
+P1: The external-attack note cites B-0858 as part of the threat-model substrate, but B-0858 is the agent-heartbeats row. If the intent is to reference the distributed cluster / cluster-fork trust-boundary substrate, update this to the correct backlog item (B-0829).
+
+### Thread 5: docs/backlog/P1/B-0859-post-boot-ai-as-home-owner-not-controlled-runtime-every-knob-from-first-boot-aaron-2026-05-27.md:1262 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-27T15:59:32Z):
+
+P1: "B-0858 cluster" is likely a mistaken reference: B-0858 is the agent-heartbeats mechanism, not the cluster-fork/distributed-cluster substrate. Update to the correct cluster-fork-as-trust-boundary row ID (B-0829) so the composition statement is accurate.
+
+## General comments
+
+### @chatgpt-codex-connector (2026-05-27T15:56:40Z)
+
+You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the [Codex usage dashboard](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/usage).