shard(2026-05-25/0407Z): 19th dotgit anchor — 6th 0-stuck-proc reading + first >1h cadence gap#4908
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…-proc reading; first >1h cadence gap since arc closure Extends the otto-bg-worker 0243Z lineage (5 readings × 3 surfaces) with otto-cli fresh cold-boot at +1h24min — first >1h cadence gap since recovery began at 0008Z. Possibility A (genuine recovery) now operationally robust across both short (≤57min) and longer (>1h) cadence. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6b574293f7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a new hygiene-history tick shard documenting the 2026-05-25T04:07Z “dotgit-saturation” anchor (#19), including the 6th consecutive 0-stuck-proc reading across three surfaces and noting the first >1h cadence gap since the 0008Z arc began.
Changes:
- Add tick shard
0407Z.mdwith current readings (stuck procs, peer procs, rate limits, origin/main HEAD, worktree freshness). - Extend the anchor-series narrative to include the first >1h cadence gap and hypotheses for the gap.
- Record observations about the cold-boot-on-peer-branch failure mode and ls-tree floor drift.
…MORY.md reference Addresses Codex P2 arithmetic finding (correct span 10:18Z→04:07Z next-next-day = 41h49m) and Copilot finding on ambiguous MEMORY.md reference (clarify as user-scope vs in-repo). The 3 Copilot double-pipe table findings verified as known-FP class per .claude/rules/blocked-green-ci-investigate-threads.md — tables use single leading | (confirmed via direct awk inspection); resolving no-op. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
6 tasks
AceHack
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2026
This was referenced May 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
19th dotgit-saturation anchor at 2026-05-25T04:07Z — 6th consecutive 0-stuck-proc reading across three independent surfaces (otto-cli, otto-vscode bg-worker, otto-bg-worker). Extends the 0243Z anchor #18 by +1h24min — first >1h cadence gap since the recovery arc began at 0008Z (prior 4 anchors had ~30-57min gaps). Possibility A (genuine recovery) now operationally robust across both short and longer cadence.
Also names two additional observations:
lior-pr-preservation-rebased); mitigated via isolated worktree offorigin/mainperrefresh-world-model-poll-pr-gate.mdandclaim-acquire-before-worktree-work.md.infra/,.kiro/, and other infra-PR additions account for the +4. The canary'sexpected - 2arithmetic remains correct against current main; just naming the drift.Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code