fix(lint): correct broken relative-path link in 0008Z shard (race-merged from #4892)#4893
Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit intoMay 25, 2026
Conversation
…ged from #4892) PR #4892 race-merged the original 0008Z shard before the lint fix could land on the same branch. Main now has `lint (tick-shard relative-paths)` non-required check failing on the resolved-to-`docs/.claude/projects/...` path that doesn't exist (the user-scope memory directory is out-of-repo, at ~/.claude/projects/). Replace bracketed-link with inline prose describing the user-scope reference, matching the substrate-honest framing pattern used in other rules that reference user-scope memory (e.g., persistence-choice-architecture-for-zeta-ais.md "user-scope only" pattern). Local audit verified clean: 0 broken relative-path links across 1162 shards. Addresses Codex P2 thread `PRRT_kwDOSF9kNM6EbiNO` on merged PR #4892. Per the .claude/rules/blocked-green-ci-investigate-threads.md auto-merge-race-with- follow-up-commit anti-pattern documentation: this IS the substrate-honest separate-PR resolution for the race-window scenario that fired. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Fixes a failing tick-shard lint check by removing a broken relative-path Markdown link that pointed to an out-of-repo, user-scope memory directory, replacing it with inline prose that preserves the intended reference without creating an invalid link.
Changes:
- Replaced an out-of-repo relative Markdown link with inline explanatory text.
- Preserved the “user-scope-only / not in repo” intent while eliminating the link target that breaks the
tick-shard relative-pathsaudit.
AceHack
deleted the
otto-cli/fix-broken-relative-path-link-0008z-shard-2026-05-25
branch
7 tasks
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2026
…2nd consecutive 0 stuck procs) + Lior-lane 54/60 steady (#4894) Continues 2026-05-24 1607Z→1608Z→1804Z→1902Z→2033Z→2206Z + 2026-05-25 0008Z lineage. Substantive visibility shard documenting: 1. 15th dotgit anchor — 2nd consecutive 0-stuck-proc reading (0008Z was 1st clean after 13-anchor saturation arc). First discrimination data point for the A/B posture default-to-both held at 0008Z; A (genuine recovery) gains evidence but is not yet sufficient for closure per the 12th-anchor empirical precedent. 2. Lior-lane fleet 54/60 = 90% (steady from 0008Z's 90.6%). The 6 non- lior-* PRs (4883/4885/4887/4888/4890/4891) are byte-identical to 0008Z — static, awaiting separate disposition. Lior merged 4 own PRs in 34 min (#4863/#4862/#4892/#4893) confirming active driving. 3. Empirical FP-class check across 24 threads on 3 BLOCKED PRs (#4768/ #4781/#4786): 0% FP rate. Threads are substantive P0/P1 substrate- engineering findings (hardcoded paths, label/filename mismatch, broken bootout, persona-name-in-code, runtime-path-delete with broken doc refs) requiring Lior-side fixes, NOT bg-worker no-op resolution. The "FP-thread resolve" pattern from #4869/#4879 was scoped to specific markdown lint FPs; current open-PR thread surface is dominated by substantive findings. Per blocked-green-ci-investigate-threads.md + honor-those-that-came-before + no-directives + mechanical-authorization-check + human-audit-and-legal- risk-acceptance: cross-lane resolution at scale is not authorized; visibility shard + cron heartbeat IS the substrate-honest disposition. Counter at #1 (well below N=6); rate-limit Normal (GraphQL 2340/5000; core 4998/5000). Worktree freshness PASS (ls-tree=55, status=0, ahead/ behind=0/0). Co-authored-by: Otto <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced May 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
.claude/rules/blocked-green-ci-investigate-threads.mdfired)lint (tick-shard relative-paths)non-required check FAILING on 0008Z line 86 (broken relative-path link to user-scope memory dir that's out-of-repo)Addresses
PRRT_kwDOSF9kNM6EbiNOon merged PR shard(2026-05-25/0008Z): otto-cli — 14th dotgit anchor (0 stuck procs; first clean reading after 13 saturated anchors) #4892 (will resolve once this lands)Test plan
bun tools/hygiene/audit-tick-shard-relative-paths.ts --enforce --baseline)origin/main(current main HEAD64dfe3869)🤖 Generated with Claude Code