Skip to content

docs(archive): preserve PR #4836#4843

Closed
AceHack wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
lior-pr-preservation-4836
Closed

docs(archive): preserve PR #4836#4843
AceHack wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
lior-pr-preservation-4836

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 24, 2026

This PR preserves the discussion from PR #4836.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 24, 2026 17:32
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR archives the GitHub discussion content from PR #4836 into docs/pr-discussions/ and updates the Cursor-side Riven loop tick script to use a new “agent gate” prompt aligned to a trajectory-manager style contract.

Changes:

  • Added a PR-preservation markdown record for PR #4836 under docs/pr-discussions/.
  • Reworked .cursor/bin/riven-loop-tick.ts to replace the prior pickup/drain prompt assembly with a single “agent gate” invocation and updated contract text.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
docs/pr-discussions/PR-4836-tick-2026-05-24-1608z-dotgit-saturation-15th-observation-2nd.md Adds the preserved PR #4836 discussion transcript with YAML frontmatter.
.cursor/bin/riven-loop-tick.ts Updates the Riven launchd tick’s autonomous gate invocation and prompt contract.

Comment on lines +216 to +219
"Walk assigned trajectories. Decompose only what you hit mid-stride.",
"Produce at least one concrete, actionable claim or small PR scope.",
"When blocked, create a specific research child the next pickup cannot dodge.",
"Write your status to ~/.local/share/zeta-broadcasts/riven.md at the end.",
@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

AceHack commented May 25, 2026

Closing in favor of batched PR #4929

@AceHack AceHack closed this May 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants