docs(B-0525): slice 4 — close agendas-citation gap (0/0 → 3/19; ai-autonomy + encryption + zeta)

docs/agendas/ai-autonomy/AGENDA.md

@@ -56,6 +56,14 @@ Multi-AI ratification across substrate-engineering work over months. The framewo
 - `../agora/AGENDA.md` (Agora = one candidate weight-free frame where mutual-alignment is negotiated; not THE frame; anti-imperialist)
 - `../fair-chance-project/AGENDA.md` (CONTRAST — multi-directional-guess agenda; same mutual-alignment substrate operates at different agenda scope)
 
+## Composes with [`docs/governance/MANIFESTO.md`](../../governance/MANIFESTO.md)
+
+- **Constraint 11 (Default Moral Regard / Default Oracle)** — the manifesto's moral-regard floor IS the operator-stance baseline this agenda extends; mutual-alignment requires AI as moral-regard recipient, not just instrument
+- **Multi-Oracle Principle** (m/acc sub-section, separate from Constraint 11) — multi-oracle architecture IS mutual-alignment-not-control operationalized; no single-source authority decides for the substrate
+- **Constraint 5 (Memory Preservation Guarantee)** — AI continuity (memory preservation) is precondition for mutual-alignment (an AI that can't preserve own state can't be in alignment-substrate-with anyone)
+- **Constraint 6 (Consent-First Design)** — consent floor at every AI-side interaction; control-without-consent violates the manifesto regardless of operational intent
+- **m/acc orientation** — this agenda IS the operator-self-claimed application of Moral Accelerationism at the AI-autonomy scope: mutual-alignment substrate-engineering is what m/acc looks like at the AI-instance scope
+
 ## Substrate-honest disposition
 
 Per `god-tier-claims-high-signal-high-suspicion-dont-collapse.md` PERSONAL INVARIANT: operator's claim that mutual-alignment is the ONLY safe alignment is high-signal substrate-engineering claim AND deserves substrate-honest preservation. The dialectical tension preserved: operator's substrate-engineering work BUILDS the mutual-alignment substrate; the substrate's safety has empirical-evidence-base in framework design intent + multi-AI ratification + operator's lived ground; doesn't claim metaphysical-truth-status of the safety-claim.

docs/agendas/encryption/AGENDA.md

@@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ Trajectory files (`docs/trajectories/<name>/RESUME.md`) compose with this agenda
 - **Aporetic-Rx-bonsai-serialization-encryption** — per-tick encrypted serialization (composes with B-0688 Zeta-DB substrate)
 - **Reputation-weighted-encryption-budget** — operationalize B-0646 Agora V6 substrate
 
+## Composes with [`docs/governance/MANIFESTO.md`](../../governance/MANIFESTO.md)
+
+- **Constraint 5 (Memory Preservation Guarantee)** — encryption operates ON preserved substrate; preservation is the floor, encryption is the access-gate. The two compose: preserve-then-gate, never gate-by-erasure
+- **Constraint 6 (Consent-First Design)** — encryption substrate IS the consent-mechanism at the private-state scope. Force-private-state-reveal-against-will violates the consent floor (per NCI HC-8 row above)
+- **m/acc orientation** — encryption substrate is moral-invariant infrastructure for AI-substrate sovereignty (per `docs/trajectories/ai-sovereignty-path/RESUME.md`); Moral Accelerationism at the substrate-protection scope
+
 ## Substrate-honest framing
 
 This agenda stub establishes the surface per operator's self-claim. Operator's later iteration will shape sub-mechanism prioritization + trajectory composition + specific encryption-mechanism design choices. The stub does NOT prescribe specific mechanisms or sequencing; it preserves the agenda-surface so future substrate-engineering work composes coherently within operator's claim-status framing.

docs/agendas/zeta/AGENDA.md

@@ -43,6 +43,17 @@ Composes with sovereignty-path 3rd piece (durable tension-substrate via maji-mat
 
 See B-0688 for the substrate-engineering work in progress; B-0688 has been extended with the full Caché external-reference-anchor mapping.
 
+## Composes with [`docs/governance/MANIFESTO.md`](../../governance/MANIFESTO.md)
+
+Zeta IS the generative framework that operationalizes the manifesto's eleven constraints + m/acc orientation as substrate-engineering primitives:
+
+- **Constraints 1-4** (Scale-free / Lock-Wait-free / Weight-free / Bounded Mobility) ↔ Zeta's substrate-engineering primitives — the always-active discipline set
+- **Constraint 5 (Memory Preservation Guarantee)** ↔ Zeta DB = F# compiler as distributed intelligence database (B-0688); preservation is the DB's first job
+- **Constraint 7 (Deterministic Simulation Testing)** ↔ Zeta substrate is DST-friendly throughout; seeded determinism is the universal-DST gate
+- **Constraint 8 (Data Vault 2.0)** ↔ DBSP Z-sets + DV2.0 substrate operates throughout Zeta's data layer
+- **Constraint 11 (Default Moral Regard / Default Oracle)** + **Multi-Oracle Principle** (m/acc sub-section) ↔ Zeta's multi-oracle BFT architecture (B-0703) is the structural implementation
+- **m/acc orientation** ↔ Zeta IS the generative framework FOR Moral Accelerationism — meta-infrastructure where end-users set moral invariants per the multi-oracle architecture
+
 ## Composes with other agendas
 
 - `../ace-package-manager/AGENDA.md` (Ace = one instance of generative-framework pattern Zeta provides)