deps: Bump Meziantou.Analyzer from 3.0.48 to 3.0.50#44
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
LabelsThe following labels could not be found: Please fix the above issues or remove invalid values from |
--- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: Meziantou.Analyzer dependency-version: 3.0.50 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
AceHack
force-pushed
the
dependabot/nuget/Meziantou.Analyzer-3.0.50
branch
from
4972914 to
b541b57
Compare
This was referenced Apr 21, 2026
AceHack
added a commit
to AceHack/Zeta
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 21, 2026
…+ follow-up BACKLOG rows Fire-history: docs/hygiene-history/skill-data-behaviour-split-history.md - 234 SKILL.md scanned, 6 multi-sig hits after rubric refinement, 4 genuine splits + 1 borderline + 1 false positive. - Genuine splits queued: performance-analysis-expert (642 lines), serialization-and-wire-format-expert (478), compression-expert (431), hashing-expert (415). All have > 100-line catalogue / background sections appropriate for a `docs/<NAME>-REFERENCE.md` data layer. - Borderline: consent-ux-researcher (single catalog embedded in otherwise-procedural content) — observe next cycle. - False positive: sweep-refs — fed rubric refinement (require > 3 catalog-style sub-items for gotcha/pitfall sections). BACKLOG rows added (P1 static-analysis/tooling, adjacent to the row Lucent-Financial-Group#51 hygiene row filed in the prior commit): 1. Retrospective split of four data-heavy expert skills — routed through `skill-creator` workflow per GOVERNANCE.md §4. 2. `skill-creator` at-landing mix-signature checklist — prevention surface. Self-modifies via canonical workflow (recursion intact). 3. `skill-tune-up` criterion-8 mix-signature — detection surface. Edited via `skill-creator` workflow; no ad-hoc SKILL.md edits. Note: authored the fire-history doc as a new file (not editing an existing SKILL.md) so GOVERNANCE.md §4 does not apply — docs under `docs/hygiene-history/**` are event-log surfaces, not skill bodies. Row Lucent-Financial-Group#51 cadence: every 5-10 rounds. Next fire expected ~2026-05-10. Row Lucent-Financial-Group#44 (cadence-history tracking) satisfied by the fire-history file's row 1 entry and fire-1 methodology section. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Apr 22, 2026
4 tasks
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
Row #44 obligation: every cadenced factory surface needs a fire- history file. Row #53 landed in the parent commit of this branch; this file records its first fire (2026-04-23). First fire is a light pass: Orientation + Gather Signal findings- only. Full overlay A/B/C/D execution deferred to a dedicated follow-up tick — this fire records the cadence observance + the findings surface. The cross-substrate MEMORY.md marker was bumped to 2026-04-23 in the per-user memory (not in-repo; upstream-schema location). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
First firing of FACTORY-HYGIENE row #54 via opportunistic-on- touch: the better-dream-mode research row in BACKLOG was authored before the AutoDream extension-overlay policy landed (PR #155); knowledge-absorb pass added a cross-reference and reframed the project from primary to more-ambitious-second- step. Fire-history file created per row #44. Bounded-pilot shape (one row updated, no retires). Self-scheduled free work. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
…oDream row First firing of FACTORY-HYGIENE row #54 (backlog-refactor cadenced audit), bounded to a single knowledge-absorb pass on one row. Target: the "Retraction-native memory-consolidation (better dream mode) research project" row. Updated to cross-reference the newer AutoDream extension-overlay policy (PR #155) + row #53. The better-dream-mode project is reframed as the more-ambitious second step conditional on the overlay policy proving insufficient — not the primary AutoDream response anymore. Fire-history file landed at docs/hygiene-history/backlog-refactor-history.md per row #44 obligation. First entry documents the bounded-pilot approach (one row updated, no retires, pre/post row count approximately unchanged). Self-scheduled free work under the 2026-04-23 scheduling- authority rule. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
Four Copilot findings: 1. "Schema per row #44" misref — row #44 on main is "Supply- chain safe-patterns audit"; fire-history schema is defined in row #47 "Cadence-history tracking hygiene". Fixed in docs/hygiene-history/backlog-refactor-history.md. 2. & 4. AutoDream research doc + row #53 dangling in-tree — clarified with "lands via PR #155" per the recurring xref pattern. 3. Row #54 not in main + memory file missing — same lands-via-PR pattern (#166 for row #54; memory lives in per-user, already noted in the row content). No code change; thread will be resolved with reply. Meta-finding: row #47 itself contains internal self-references calling itself "row #44" (from a prior row-number era that renumbered without updating self-refs). This is a pre-existing inconsistency, not caused by this PR. Candidate for backlog- refactor hygiene #54 sweep when it fires against FACTORY-HYGIENE.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
…ught 4 Copilot findings on PR #168: 2 xref (lands-via-#155); 1 row-number misreference ("Schema per row #44" was actually #47 — row #44 is supply-chain; #47 is cadence-history); 1 combined reply-with-rationale. Meta-finding (commit-body only, not this PR's scope): row #47 itself has internal self-refs calling itself "row #44" from a prior renumbering. Flagged as candidate for row #54 first-fire sweep. Fixed docs/hygiene-history/backlog-refactor-history.md + docs/BACKLOG.md; rebased; pushed. 4 threads resolved. Observation: row-number misref is a new finding class I hadn't seen. Copilot review caught it; target for row #54 sweeps. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
…ow) (#168) * hygiene: first backlog-refactor fire — knowledge-absorb update on AutoDream row First firing of FACTORY-HYGIENE row #54 (backlog-refactor cadenced audit), bounded to a single knowledge-absorb pass on one row. Target: the "Retraction-native memory-consolidation (better dream mode) research project" row. Updated to cross-reference the newer AutoDream extension-overlay policy (PR #155) + row #53. The better-dream-mode project is reframed as the more-ambitious second step conditional on the overlay policy proving insufficient — not the primary AutoDream response anymore. Fire-history file landed at docs/hygiene-history/backlog-refactor-history.md per row #44 obligation. First entry documents the bounded-pilot approach (one row updated, no retires, pre/post row count approximately unchanged). Self-scheduled free work under the 2026-04-23 scheduling- authority rule. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> * hygiene: address PR #168 review findings Four Copilot findings: 1. "Schema per row #44" misref — row #44 on main is "Supply- chain safe-patterns audit"; fire-history schema is defined in row #47 "Cadence-history tracking hygiene". Fixed in docs/hygiene-history/backlog-refactor-history.md. 2. & 4. AutoDream research doc + row #53 dangling in-tree — clarified with "lands via PR #155" per the recurring xref pattern. 3. Row #54 not in main + memory file missing — same lands-via-PR pattern (#166 for row #54; memory lives in per-user, already noted in the row content). No code change; thread will be resolved with reply. Meta-finding: row #47 itself contains internal self-references calling itself "row #44" (from a prior row-number era that renumbered without updating self-refs). This is a pre-existing inconsistency, not caused by this PR. Candidate for backlog- refactor hygiene #54 sweep when it fires against FACTORY-HYGIENE.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
Copilot caught two row-number inconsistencies: - "Cross-platform parity (FACTORY-HYGIENE row #48)" was incorrect — row #48 is GitHub surface triage; cross- platform parity is row #51. Fixed. - "fire-log surfaces per row #44" was incorrect — row #44 is supply-chain safe-patterns; cadence-history / fire- history schema is row #47. Fixed + clarified. Third finding (docs/research/multi-repo-refactor-shapes path) — will be handled via reply-with-rationale (lands via PR #150, still open). Row-number misref is a recurring finding class across session PRs; candidate sweep target for backlog-refactor hygiene row #54 first cadenced fire. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
…w-number fixes PR #159 (Overlay A #3 deletions-over-insertions) MERGED at 18:02:47Z. 11 session PRs merged. HLL test passed on re-run (different seed) — real-world data for the PR #175 BACKLOG row on HLL flakiness; pin-then-explore is still the right fix. Aaron directive: "be PC when you write the 69 and 420 descriptions of whemsy we want this repo to be high school curruclurm friendly so R rated is okay but only when necessary for effect." PC-ified seed-whimsy memory descriptions (69 → internet-meme-symmetrical-digit; 420 → counterculture-meme). Added PC-framing section naming the high-school-curriculum-friendly standard. PR #172 row-number misrefs fixed (#48 → #51 for cross- platform parity; #44 → #47 for fire-history schema). Third finding via lands-via-#150 reply. Row-number misref is recurring; candidate for row #54 first cadenced fire. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
…o-split) (#172) * backlog: P2 — factory status UI on GitHub Pages (git-native, post-repo-split) Aaron 2026-04-23: "static ui on our github pages that shows factory status things in flight progress, etc ... we can surface thing in the ui like the decions and any decions we would like human feedback on ... all this should be able to use our gitnative approach and not really cost anyting ... backlog this and probaby not a good idea until after the repo split into the different projects." Row captures: - Goal: static UI surfacing factory state (PRs, ADRs, HUMAN-BACKLOG asks, round progress) - Constraint: git-native + ~free (static SSG regenerated by GitHub Action; no paid SaaS) - Tech candidates deferred (Jekyll / Hugo / Astro / Eleventy / bun-based custom SSG — bun aligns with post-setup stack row #49) - Sequencing: after multi-repo split (PR #150 prerequisite) - Cross-refs to AGENT-GITHUB-SURFACES Pages row, HUMAN- BACKLOG, DECISIONS, ROUND-HISTORY, hygiene-history P2 per Aaron's "probably not a good idea until after the repo split" sequencing hint. Self-scheduled free work (row-filing) under the 2026-04-23 scheduling-authority rule. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> * backlog: Pages-UI row — add read-only-first / write-later refinement Aaron 2026-04-23: "ui will likely need gh, our repo is public so for all the read actions on the ui we are good without permission, for write actions we probably don't need this yet would need whole permission set and resue of the github logins session stuff without a real backend, tricky stuff so readonly to expaned to write access later. backlog just a little refinement." Row updated with: - Phase 1 read-only: GitHub REST API against public repo, no auth (rate-limit applies; acceptable per-push-refresh dashboard) - Phase 2 write: needs GitHub session/OAuth or thin backend; both break git-native + ~free-to-run; deferred until tradeoff re-examined Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> * backlog: Pages-UI row — bun+TS as tech choice; Jekyll excluded per maintainer Aaron 2026-04-23 reminder: "i'm fine with either but last time you push me hard away from jekyll that i think we only need typescript bun based and no jekyll unless you tell me otherwise." Row updated: - Tech choice is bun + TypeScript SSG (composes with FACTORY-HYGIENE row #49 post-setup stack default) - Jekyll explicitly excluded - Hugo / Astro / Eleventy demoted from listed candidates - If a compelling reason to revisit Jekyll surfaces during research, it lands as an ADR with explicit rationale; default is bun+TS Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> * backlog: Pages-UI row — fix Jekyll-exclusion attribution (Kenji, not maintainer) Aaron 2026-04-23: "technically Kenji told me to exclude this not me, feel free to reevnualte but take the whole project into consideration". Row updated: - Attribution corrected: Kenji (Architect persona) made the bun+TS-over-Jekyll recommendation, not the maintainer directly - Re-evaluation with whole-project consideration documented: cross-platform parity (row #48), post-setup stack default (row #49), one-language-rule (no new Ruby chain), GitHub Pages + Actions build pattern works regardless of native- Pages SSG support, bun+SSG ecosystem rich enough - Conclusion: Kenji's call stands after re-examination Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> * backlog: Pages-UI row — apply plural-host distinction (git-native content vs GitHub adapter) Aaron 2026-04-23: "i guess pages is github native, but our code can likely be git native only need git and not gh commands but gh commands are welcome we just need to call out gh becasue we want to be pluggable eventually to gitlab to, we are gitnative with our first host as github." Row constraint-section refined to distinguish: - Git-native content (PRs / ADRs / HUMAN-BACKLOG / CONTRIBUTOR-CONFLICTS / ROUND-HISTORY / hygiene-history — lives in repo regardless of host) - GitHub adapter (Pages + Actions + REST API are GitHub-specific; UI itself is explicitly labeled as the GitHub adapter against the git-native content spec) When a second host activates (GitLab / Gitea / Bitbucket), a sibling adapter ships against the same content spec. First host is GitHub per "gitnative with our first host as github". Full plural-host discipline in per-user memory feedback_git_native_vs_github_native_plural_host_pluggable_adapters_2026_04_23.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> * backlog: Pages-UI row — fix row-number misrefs per PR #172 review Copilot caught two row-number inconsistencies: - "Cross-platform parity (FACTORY-HYGIENE row #48)" was incorrect — row #48 is GitHub surface triage; cross- platform parity is row #51. Fixed. - "fire-log surfaces per row #44" was incorrect — row #44 is supply-chain safe-patterns; cadence-history / fire- history schema is row #47. Fixed + clarified. Third finding (docs/research/multi-repo-refactor-shapes path) — will be handled via reply-with-rationale (lands via PR #150, still open). Row-number misref is a recurring finding class across session PRs; candidate sweep target for backlog-refactor hygiene row #54 first cadenced fire. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated Meziantou.Analyzer from 3.0.48 to 3.0.50.
Release notes
Sourced from Meziantou.Analyzer's releases.
3.0.50
NuGet package: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Meziantou.Analyzer/3.0.50
What's Changed
Full Changelog: meziantou/Meziantou.Analyzer@3.0.49...3.0.50
3.0.49
NuGet package: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Meziantou.Analyzer/3.0.49
What's Changed
istype checks as internal type usage by @Copilot in MA0182: treatistype checks as internal type usage meziantou/Meziantou.Analyzer#1096Full Changelog: meziantou/Meziantou.Analyzer@3.0.48...3.0.49
Commits viewable in compare view.
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)