drain(#126 follow-up): Gemini capability map xref truth-update#428
Merged
drain(#126 follow-up): Gemini capability map xref truth-update#428
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates a cross-reference note in the Grok CLI capability map to reflect that the Gemini capability map has already landed in main, removing outdated “not yet merged” wording.
Changes:
- Rewords the “Companion to” entry for the Gemini CLI map to indicate it is now in
main. - Adjusts the surrounding phrasing to reflect current repository state.
…ok is the pre-install sketch Two Codex post-merge findings on the #126 follow-up PR #428: P2 — Gemini link plain-text vs others clickable: The Gemini entry in the Companion-to list was plain text while Claude and Codex were clickable markdown links. Made it consistent: all three siblings now link to their respective docs. P1 — 'sibling pre-install sketch' wording implied Gemini was also a pre-install sketch: The Gemini map is actually 'first map — verified against gemini --version 0.39.1 on 2026-04-24'. My follow-up wording said 'sibling pre-install sketch using the same template' which read as if Gemini was also pre-install. Reworded to '(v0.39.1, verified). The Grok map below is the only pre-install sketch in this set; Claude / Codex / Gemini siblings are all verified.'
7ac3799 to
cc2e64d
Compare
This was referenced Apr 25, 2026
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2026
…mini xref) Otto-268 follow-on: drain-log for the targeted single-finding cascade PR #428 (post-merge follow-up to parent #126 Grok CLI capability map). Captures one Gemini capability-map cross-reference truth-update. Per Otto-250 training-signal discipline. Pattern observations: 1. Cross-capability-map xref consistency is its own class. The repo has a growing family of CLI capability maps (Codex / Grok / Gemini / Claude Code) that form a related-document cluster needing joint cross-reference maintenance. Future doc-lint candidate: maintain manifest of related-document clusters and warn on edit-without-sweep. 2. Multi-CLI capability-map family is its own substrate pattern. Worth documenting in `_patterns.md`: when multiple capability maps cover overlapping but distinct CLIs, they form a cluster that benefits from shared structure (status taxonomy, parity- matrix shape, score-summary conventions) and joint cross-reference maintenance. 3. Targeted single-finding follow-ups are the cheapest cascade shape — 1 finding / 1 commit / 1 merge gate. Cascade-pattern amortized cost is dominated by the few-thread cascades. URL → PR-number defensive pattern continues (lesson from #454/#455 collision earlier this session).
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2026
…#460) * hygiene(#268+): pr-preservation drain-log for #428 (#126 follow-up Gemini xref) Otto-268 follow-on: drain-log for the targeted single-finding cascade PR #428 (post-merge follow-up to parent #126 Grok CLI capability map). Captures one Gemini capability-map cross-reference truth-update. Per Otto-250 training-signal discipline. Pattern observations: 1. Cross-capability-map xref consistency is its own class. The repo has a growing family of CLI capability maps (Codex / Grok / Gemini / Claude Code) that form a related-document cluster needing joint cross-reference maintenance. Future doc-lint candidate: maintain manifest of related-document clusters and warn on edit-without-sweep. 2. Multi-CLI capability-map family is its own substrate pattern. Worth documenting in `_patterns.md`: when multiple capability maps cover overlapping but distinct CLIs, they form a cluster that benefits from shared structure (status taxonomy, parity- matrix shape, score-summary conventions) and joint cross-reference maintenance. 3. Targeted single-finding follow-ups are the cheapest cascade shape — 1 finding / 1 commit / 1 merge gate. Cascade-pattern amortized cost is dominated by the few-thread cascades. URL → PR-number defensive pattern continues (lesson from #454/#455 collision earlier this session). * drain(#460 follow-up): fix capability-map xref + inline-code-span split Codex P2 + Copilot P1+P2 caught: - Inline code span split across newline (`docs/` on one line, `research/openai-codex-cli-capability-map.md` on the next) — reflowed to single-line so the path renders as one token. - Capability-map cluster listed `docs/research/codex-cli-first- class-2026-04-23.md` as if in-tree, but PR #231 is still OPEN at time of this drain-log so the file isn't yet in main. Reframed as 'pending merge of PR #231; will be in-tree once that PR lands' with the in-tree `openai-codex-cli-capability-map.md` listed first. Same forward-author-to-future-state-of-main drift class as #377 (38% stale-resolved density). The drain-log itself exhibits the pattern it documents — cited a forthcoming-but-not-yet-landed file as if already present. Inline-code-span line-wrap is the 5th observation of that class in the corpus (now: #191 / #195 / #219 / #423 / #460). At this density the doc-lint Class A (PR #465 BACKLOG) is high-leverage automation.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Codex post-merge thread on PR #126:
docs/research/gemini-cli-capability-map.mdwas described as "currently on PR #122, not yet merged", but the file now exists in main. Updated to "landed in main; sibling pre-install sketch using the same template".