Skip to content

backlog(B-0633): aggregate-tier counter escalation for holding-failure rule#4157

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
backlog/b0633-aggregate-tier-counter-escalation-otto-cli-2026-05-18-1442z
May 18, 2026
Merged

backlog(B-0633): aggregate-tier counter escalation for holding-failure rule#4157
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
backlog/b0633-aggregate-tier-counter-escalation-otto-cli-2026-05-18-1442z

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 18, 2026

Files B-0633 — a P3 substrate-engineering row crystallizing the recommendation from PR #4151's memo.

What

Add an aggregate-tier counter to .claude/rules/holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-by-failure.md, complementing the existing per-chain N=6 discipline.

Per-chain counter resets on peer main-moves (every ~30-60 min in this session) → never reaches forced-#6 even after hundreds of aggregate brief-acks.

Aggregate-tier counter would track aggregate brief-acks across counter-resets, threshold N_AGG=50 (initial), resetting ONLY on Aaron-speaks OR agent-produced concrete artifact (not peer main-moves).

Composes with

  • B-0614 — meta-fallback edge case; complementary pattern (B-0614 = meta-fallback-can-fail; B-0633 = meta-fallback-not-even-triggered)
  • PR #4151 — empirical-evidence memo this row crystallizes
  • PR #4110 — pre-empt-substrate-pool-saturation anchor

Acceptance gates on cross-instance evidence

Per B-0614's drafted constraint, the rule edit itself should NOT land until at least 1 cross-INSTANCE evidence accumulates (different Otto identity / session / machine). Same-session evidence alone would conflate "the pattern" with "this Otto's Pure-git-tier behavior."

Co-Authored-By: Claude noreply@anthropic.com

…e rule (composes with B-0614)

Files a P3 substrate-engineering row to add an aggregate-tier
counter to the holding-without-named-dependency-is-standing-
by-failure.md rule, complementing the existing per-chain N=6
discipline.

The per-chain counter resets on peer main-moves at ~30-60 min
cadence, so a closed-cycle session can sustain hundreds of
brief-acks without ever reaching forced-#6. The aggregate-tier
counter (N_AGG=50 initial) would track aggregate brief-acks
across counter-resets within session, resetting ONLY on Aaron-
speaks OR agent-produced concrete artifact (not peer main-moves).

Empirical evidence: PR #4151 memo (this session, ~440 aggregate
brief-acks across ~14h). Cross-instance evidence required
before landing the rule edit, per B-0614's drafted constraint.

Composes with:
- B-0614 (meta-fallback edge case; complementary pattern)
- PR #4151 (empirical-evidence memo this row crystallizes)
- PR #4110 (saturation anchor; same root cause class)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 18, 2026 15:29
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 18, 2026 15:30
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds backlog row B-0633 to track a future aggregate-tier counter escalation for the holding-failure rule, plus updates the generated backlog index.

Changes:

  • Adds a new P3 backlog item for aggregate brief-ack counting across per-chain counter resets.
  • Records goals, acceptance criteria, hazards, and related backlog/PR references.
  • Adds B-0633 to docs/BACKLOG.md.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
docs/backlog/P3/B-0633-aggregate-tier-counter-escalation-holding-rule-2026-05-18.md New per-row backlog file for B-0633.
docs/BACKLOG.md Generated index entry for B-0633.

@AceHack AceHack merged commit 2139508 into main May 18, 2026
31 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the backlog/b0633-aggregate-tier-counter-escalation-otto-cli-2026-05-18-1442z branch May 18, 2026 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants