docs(archive): Lior PR preservation 4054 and 4051

[AceHack]

Preserving alignment drift and review friction.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Adds two new PR-discussion archive documents under docs/pr-discussions/ to preserve the metadata, descriptions, and review-thread context for PRs #4054 and #4051.

Changes:

• Adds an archived PR discussion record for PR #4054 (including captured Copilot review summary/threads).
• Adds an archived PR discussion record for PR #4051 (including captured Copilot review threads).

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
docs/pr-discussions/PR-4054-substrate-otto-cli-b-0611-followup-memos-2-tick-shards-from.md	New PR #4054 archive entry; includes embedded review output and threads.
docs/pr-discussions/PR-4051-fix-rules-pr-4050-follow-up-math-inconsistency-persona-name.md	New PR #4051 archive entry; includes embedded review threads.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

docs/pr-discussions/PR-4054-substrate-otto-cli-b-0611-followup-memos-2-tick-shards-from.md:107

• There’s an extra standalone ``` fence pair around the quoted line and “## Methodology” header, which makes non-code content render as code (and likely isn’t intended in the preserved transcript). Remove these fences or convert this excerpt to a properly escaped block so headings/quotes render normally.

* tools/hygiene/validate-memory-schema.ts expects `project` (and `feedback`) memory files to include the literal body markers `Why:` and `How to apply:`. This catalog memo is mostly data, but it currently has neither marker string, so it will be flagged as missing required markers. Add short `Why:` and `How to apply:` sections (e.g., explaining what the catalog is for and how to use it) to match the standard format.

sites get hidden."*

Methodology

Bash one-liner using grep -rn (line-preserving) instead of grep -rh
(line-stripping) + filter-by-filesystem-existence:

</details>