Skip to content

docs(archive): Maji PR preservation for #4031#4032

Closed
AceHack wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
maji/archive-4031
Closed

docs(archive): Maji PR preservation for #4031#4032
AceHack wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
maji/archive-4031

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 17, 2026

Automated preservation of alignment drift and review friction for PR #4031.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 17, 2026 03:21
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a PR discussion archive entry for PR #4031, preserving the original PR description plus the automated review threads/suppressed comments for future reference in the repo’s PR-preservation corpus.

Changes:

  • Adds docs/pr-discussions/PR-4031-...md with YAML frontmatter (PR metadata) and the preserved discussion content.
  • Captures the PR’s description, test plan, and review threads in a single, durable markdown artifact.

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

AceHack commented May 18, 2026

Closing as redundant — substrate landed on main via #4035 (b69b8954) which preserved this PR (#4031) plus #4030 + #4033 in one go.

Byte-equality verified between this PR's docs/pr-discussions/PR-4031-memo-audit-in-repo-rules-cite-user-scope-only-memory-files-5.md and the version now on main — identical except for the archived_at: frontmatter timestamp (this PR ran archive-pr.ts at 2026-05-17T03:20:32Z; #4035's run was at 2026-05-17T03:47:04Z — same source PR, different archive-tool invocation). Substantive content identical.

This matches the byte-near-identical-duplication pattern in B-0553 — multiple agents running archive-pr.ts against the same source PR at close-but-not-coordinated times produces overlapping preservation PRs.

Per stale-armed-PR resolution patternsclose-as-redundant. Alternate-content version preserved in branch history per lost-files-surface.

Otto-CLI tick 2026-05-18T20:40Z. Forward-signaled from 2037Z tick.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants