Skip to content

shard(tick): 2026-05-16T16:10Z — fix relative-path depth in 1535Z + 1547Z (CI lint catch); path-depth reference table#3903

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
otto-cli-tick-shard-1610z-fix-relative-paths-2026-05-16
May 16, 2026
Merged

shard(tick): 2026-05-16T16:10Z — fix relative-path depth in 1535Z + 1547Z (CI lint catch); path-depth reference table#3903
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
otto-cli-tick-shard-1610z-fix-relative-paths-2026-05-16

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 16, 2026

Summary

CI lint (`tick-shard relative-paths`) caught 7 broken links on each of PRs #3898 + #3900. Root cause: from `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/YYYY/MM/DD/HHMMZ.md`, root is 6 levels up (not 5).

This shard documents the path-depth reference table so future tick-authoring (any of the 3 Otto surfaces — CLI sentinel, Desktop routine, B-0448 cloud) inherits correct depths at cold-boot.

Path-depth reference table

Target `../` count
sibling shard 0
`docs/` 5× `../`
`docs/backlog/...` 5× `../` + `backlog/...`
`docs/AUTONOMOUS-LOOP-PER-TICK.md` 5× `../` + file
repo root 6× `../`
`.claude/rules/...` 6× `../` + `.claude/rules/...`

Companion fixes

Test plan

  • `bun tools/hygiene/audit-tick-shard-relative-paths.ts` exit 0 locally (1610Z + 1535Z branches)
  • No code/skill/agent surface; docs-only

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…547Z (CI lint catch); path-depth reference table

CI lint (tick-shard relative-paths) caught 7 broken links on each of
PR #3898 + #3900. Root cause: from docs/hygiene-history/ticks/YYYY/MM/
DD/HHMMZ.md, root is 6 levels up (not 5).

Fix-companions on the two shard branches; this shard documents the
path-depth reference table so future tick-authoring (any of the 3
Otto surfaces) inherits correct depths at cold-boot:

| Target            | ../ count |
|-------------------|-----------|
| sibling shard     | 0         |
| docs/...          | 5         |
| docs/backlog/...  | 5 + backlog/ |
| repo root         | 6         |
| .claude/rules/... | 6 + .claude/rules/ |

Local audit exit 0 after fix. Budget reset hit during prior tick;
no longer in extreme cost-aware tier.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 16, 2026 16:19
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 16, 2026 16:19
@AceHack AceHack merged commit 943cc3d into main May 16, 2026
26 of 27 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the otto-cli-tick-shard-1610z-fix-relative-paths-2026-05-16 branch May 16, 2026 16:21
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new hygiene-history tick shard documenting a CI lint catch and the corrected relative-path depth rules for tick shards under docs/hygiene-history/ticks/YYYY/MM/DD/HHMMZ.md.

Changes:

  • Documents the root cause of broken tick-shard relative links (repo root is 6× ../; docs/ is 5× ../).
  • Records a path-depth reference table intended to prevent future tick-shard link-depth mistakes.
  • Summarizes companion fix branches/PRs related to the lint failure.

Comment on lines +41 to +44
- **Fix branch 1: `otto-cli-tick-shard-1535z-b0462-handoff-2026-05-16`** at `fe49b8e` — 1535Z shard paths corrected, push landed
- **Fix branch 2: `otto-cli-tick-shard-1547z-cascade-confirm-2026-05-16`** at `53bc359` — 1547Z shard paths corrected + 1535Z.md sibling link → PR #3898 URL
- Both push to same PRs (#3898 + #3900); auto-merge should re-trigger lint check

Comment on lines +72 to +73
- [`../../../../AUTONOMOUS-LOOP-PER-TICK.md`](../../../../../AUTONOMOUS-LOOP-PER-TICK.md)
(wait — that's the WRONG path; should be 5× ../) — corrected:
Comment on lines +66 to +67
reference table in this shard so future tick-authoring authors (any of the 3
Otto surfaces) inherit the correct depths at cold-boot. Lint should pass on
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2026
…6× ../; docs/ needs 5× ../) (#3906)

PR #3900 auto-merged the ORIGINAL broken-paths commit 9986e58
BEFORE the fix-push 53bc359 (to the same branch) registered. The
broken 1547Z.md is now on main and was blocking PR #3898's lint
check.

This direct-fix-on-main re-applies the same corrections that lived
on the now-orphaned 1547Z branch's fix-commit. Once merged, PR
#3898 will pass lint and auto-merge.

The path-depth reference table for future tick-authoring is
documented in 1610Z.md (landed via PR #3903) so this class of
error has wake-time substrate.

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2026
…med-dep loop closed (#3908)

* fix(rules): document 3 stale-armed-PR resolution patterns in blocked-green-ci rule

This session's empirical evidence (5 stale-armed PR investigations
between 13:10Z and 16:33Z) clarifies three distinct resolution
patterns: close-as-redundant, re-land-via-cherry-pick, and
forward-signal-comment. Added a decision tree and links to the
empirical instances.

Composes with the forced-escalation-finds-hidden-work anchor on
holding-without-named-dependency rule (PR #3901).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* shard(tick): 2026-05-16T16:34Z — cascade complete; lint-failure-as-named-dep loop closed

1h 03m cascade from 1531Z → 1634Z. PRs #3897 (B-0462), #3898 (1535Z
shard), #3900 (1547Z shard), #3903 (1610Z + path-depth table) all
merged. PR #3906 (fix-1547z-on-main) auto-merging cleanly (22/25
SUCCESS, 2 pending).

Substrate-honest lessons:
- Auto-merge race (sub-case 5 of claim-acquire saturation-ceiling)
- Lint check classification: broken paths on main propagate as
  new errors to subsequent PRs via the audit's all-shards scan
- Path-depth reference table (1610Z, PR #3903) is the durable
  substrate fix

Persistent contamination: git branch --show-current caught HEAD-shift
to 5 different peer-Otto branches across 5 cron fires; no commits
landed on peer branches.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2026
…lly at 10 close-rows (#3907)

* fix(shard-1547z-on-main): correct relative-path depth (.claude needs 6× ../; docs/ needs 5× ../)

PR #3900 auto-merged the ORIGINAL broken-paths commit 9986e58
BEFORE the fix-push 53bc359 (to the same branch) registered. The
broken 1547Z.md is now on main and was blocking PR #3898's lint
check.

This direct-fix-on-main re-applies the same corrections that lived
on the now-orphaned 1547Z branch's fix-commit. Once merged, PR
#3898 will pass lint and auto-merge.

The path-depth reference table for future tick-authoring is
documented in 1610Z.md (landed via PR #3903) so this class of
error has wake-time substrate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* shard(tick): 2026-05-16T16:18Z — B-0549 = class #2-SD; session at 10 close-rows

Audit: B-0549 (Riven Cursor Terminal background loop).
156 LOC ships heartbeat + gate + bus; AUTONOMOUS-LOOP.md docs unshipped.
8 [ ] checkboxes self-document partial. Class #2-SD. NO edit.

Session tally: 10 close-rows + 30+ audit shards across ~6h.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2026
…ntinues (#3918)

PR #3915 (1706Z settling) MERGED. 11-PR session arc (1531Z → 1706Z)
on cron-tick discipline durably on main:
- Path-depth ref table (PR #3903)
- Pattern 3 / class #1 anchor (PR #3912)
- Peer's 5-class taxonomy (PR #3913)
- Settling-tick framing (PRs #3914 + #3915)

Substantive backlog rows (B-0030, B-0027 etc.) deferred to quieter
peer-saturation windows where start-gate work + bounded-context
contamination recovery overhead is lower.

No brief-acks; not in Standing-by. Single-observation tick.

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants