shard(tick): 2026-05-16T07:27Z — B-0509 = 2nd FP class (2nd in a row); FP-rate pattern noted#3813
shard(tick): 2026-05-16T07:27Z — B-0509 = 2nd FP class (2nd in a row); FP-rate pattern noted#3813AceHack wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
…; FP-rate pattern noted Twenty-seventh tick. Cost-aware tier. Audited B-0509: - tool path tools/routines/install.ts exists (for B-0448 slice 1) - B-0509-specific 'cloud-schedule' references absent via grep - Same shape as B-0418 last tick: shared-tool path FP Two consecutive 2nd-FP-class verifications. Hypothesis filed for peer's audit-tool improvement lane: add a 'feature-grep' sub-check scanning artifacts for acceptance-named identifiers. Audit progress: 17/38 triaged. ~21 remaining. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a tick log under docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/16/0727Z.md documenting a backlog drift audit. The tick verifies B-0509 as a second false-positive class (shared-tool-path FP) and notes an emerging FP-rate pattern with a hypothesis for the audit tool.
Changes:
- New tick file recording audit result for B-0509 (2nd FP class, leave open)
- Tabulates triage progress and an empirical FP-rate observation across B-0418 and B-0509
- Files a hypothesis for a feature-grep sub-check in the audit tool
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 34a29ee1e4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Codex flagged: B-0159 appeared in both class 1 (pure drift) AND class 4 (multi-slice all children closed) — mutually exclusive categories. B-0159 is class 4 (per tick 1640Z re-classification); class 1 listing was stale carry-over. Class 1 count: 9 → 8. Total triaged: 17 → 16. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Closing as superseded —
So main's version reflects a decision that OVERTURNED this PR's B-0159 removal — likely a subsequent tick re-added B-0159 to class 1. This PR represents an alternate-history branch where the removal stuck. Following the stale-armed-PR resolution pattern from PR #3910:
The alternate-history content is preserved on this PR's branch |
Pull request was closed
…ependabot PRs merged (#3798, #3810) (#3909) * shard(tick): 2026-05-16T16:43Z otto-bg-worker — catch-43 re-arm + 2 dependabot PRs merged Cron sentinel was missing at session start; re-armed via CronCreate with <<autonomous-loop>> sentinel (job 3933804e). Two dependabot PRs went green-to-merge once auto-merge was armed: - #3798 codeql-action 4.35.4→4.35.5 (merged fe6c4e9) - #3810 FSharp.Core + 3 others NuGet bump (merged 16:42:27Z) Both had required checks green; only non-required lint was non-success (cancelled on #3798, archive-header §33 mis-fire on #3810). GraphQL traversed Normal→Cost-aware→Extreme cost-aware (1073→645 in single tick). poll-pr-gate-batch.ts on 10 PRs costs ~N×35 GraphQL — documented in the shard. Other polled PRs (#3545, #3597, #3599, #3633, #3643, #3670, #3714, #3813) deferred to claim-owner per honor-those-that-came-before + claim-acquire-before-worktree-work disciplines. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(shard-1643z): correct filename reference 06:42Z.md → 0642Z.md (Copilot finding) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
B-0509 verified as 2nd FP class. Two consecutive shared-tool-path FPs (B-0418 + B-0509). Hypothesis filed for peer's audit-tool improvement: feature-grep sub-check.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code