Skip to content

shard(tick): 0548z-otto-cli-2026-05-16#3767

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
shard/tick-0548z-otto-cli-2026-05-16
May 16, 2026
Merged

shard(tick): 0548z-otto-cli-2026-05-16#3767
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
shard/tick-0548z-otto-cli-2026-05-16

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 16, 2026

Tick shard from this resume-session series. Auto-PR'd during post-rate-reset sweep at tick 0559Z.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…ed (pure-git); pattern validated x2

Fifteenth tick. Brief-ack #2 of new counter cycle. Same pure-git
workflow as last tick applied to B-0533: pure-git audit, Status
section, commit to dedicated branch, push, defer PR.

Two consecutive empirical validations of the pattern:
- B-0532 (tick 0545Z): hard-error slice shipped, Slice 2 pending
- B-0533 (tick 0548Z): lint tool shipped, Slice A sweep pending

Pure-git audit workflow becoming the repeatable fallback for
rate-limit zero ticks.

7 branches now awaiting post-reset PR creation (~5 min).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 16, 2026 06:00
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 16, 2026 06:01
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a single tick-history note documenting a hygiene tick during a rate-limit-zero window, recording a B-0533 partial-completion audit and a pure-git audit pattern.

Changes:

  • New tick file under docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/16/ recording refresh state, B-0533 audit conclusion, and counter status.

@AceHack AceHack merged commit 91b020e into main May 16, 2026
29 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the shard/tick-0548z-otto-cli-2026-05-16 branch May 16, 2026 06:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants