docs(archive): Lior preservation check 2026-05-16T0230Z#3682
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Automated archival of three recently merged PRs (#3676, #3678, #3679) into docs/pr-discussions/ for permanent preservation of review history and drift-cleanup context. Generated by tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts; content is verbatim preservation of GitHub PR metadata, descriptions, reviews, and threads.
Changes:
- Adds preservation file for PR #3676 (Otto-CLI cold-boot cron-rearm tick shard).
- Adds preservation file for PR #3678 (BACKLOG.md generated-index regen).
- Adds preservation file for PR #3679 (tick shard recording #3678 cleanup).
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/pr-discussions/PR-3676-shard-tick-2026-05-16t02-10z-otto-cli-cold-boot-cron-rearm-l.md | Archived PR #3676 conversation + Copilot review threads. |
| docs/pr-discussions/PR-3678-fix-hygiene-regen-docs-backlog-md-index-clear-generated-inde.md | Archived PR #3678 conversation + unresolved B-0498 duplicate-ID thread. |
| docs/pr-discussions/PR-3679-shard-tick-2026-05-16t02-13z-otto-cli-backlog-md-regen-3678.md | Archived PR #3679 conversation + review threads. |
These files are under docs/pr-discussions/**, a history-surface path where author attribution (e.g., "AceHack", agent persona names like "Lior") is correctly preserved verbatim per the archival tool's role. No code or current-state surfaces are modified. The contents are mechanically generated PR transcripts; flagging spelling/style/link issues inside the verbatim quoted PR bodies and reviewer comments would violate the "preserve original verbatim" rule for archive surfaces.
Automated preservation of recently merged PRs (3679, 3678, 3676) into docs/pr-discussions/ for permanent retention of alignment drift and review friction.