Skip to content

loop: tick-history row — Otto-222#364

Merged
AceHack merged 2 commits intomainfrom
loop/tick-history-otto-222
Apr 24, 2026
Merged

loop: tick-history row — Otto-222#364
AceHack merged 2 commits intomainfrom
loop/tick-history-otto-222

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented Apr 24, 2026

Append-only tick-history row for the Otto-222 lint-shipping tick (PR #363).

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 24, 2026 12:28
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Appends a new tick entry to the autonomous-loop fire-history ledger to record the Otto-222 event (shipping the doc-comment history-audit lint in PR #363).

Changes:

  • Add a new tick-history row for 2026-04-24T12:27:54Z documenting Otto-222 / PR #363.

Comment thread docs/hygiene-history/loop-tick-history.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/hygiene-history/loop-tick-history.md Outdated
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) April 24, 2026 12:37
AceHack added 2 commits April 24, 2026 09:19
…601 date

Thread PRRT_kwDOSF9kNM59ZMkP: blank line at former line 167 removed so
GitHub-flavored Markdown treats the Otto-222 row as part of the same
table block (GFM terminates a table on blank line).

Thread PRRT_kwDOSF9kNM59ZMk-: "May 1" -> "2026-05-01" in the Otto-222
row Copilot-LFG-budget reset reference for consistency with the
timestamp column ISO8601 convention used elsewhere in the file.

Rebase conflict resolution with main (which now has Otto-219..221 and
Otto-222..224 rows) preserved all three tick rows in chronological order
within a single contiguous table block.
@AceHack AceHack force-pushed the loop/tick-history-otto-222 branch from fa82fe8 to a2ca6f3 Compare April 24, 2026 13:20
@AceHack AceHack merged commit 5640cdd into main Apr 24, 2026
10 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the loop/tick-history-otto-222 branch April 24, 2026 13:22
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a2ca6f3af6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/hygiene-history/loop-tick-history.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants